High lead levels found in artificial turf at both of Northern Valley
Regional’s high schools have prompted school officials to close the
fields indefinitely.
The results came just a week after state
officials recommended that the federal government investigate nearly
4,000 artificial turf fields in use nationwide, following sample tests
that found lead at three fields in New Jersey.
That round of testing did not include Northern Valley, which tested its fields independently.
Now,
more testing of the fields at the Demarest and Old Tappan locations
will be done to determine how serious the problem is and whether the
fields might need to be replaced.
“We want to take every
precaution to find out exactly what we have… before we let anybody go
back on the fields,” said Ray Jacobus, the assistant superintendent for
business.
State health department officials say children would
need to have prolonged contact with the fields as well as exposure to
lead in other settings before their health would be at risk. Inhaling
or ingesting lead can cause brain damage and other neurological
illnesses, state health officials say.
“The main concern is the
cumulative effect of a child being exposed to lead from a field when
also exposed to lead at home,” said Marilyn Riley, a Department of
Health and Senior Services spokeswoman. “That’s where more of the
concern is.”
Concentrations of lead in fibers from the
green-colored synthetic turf at the Demarest school’s field were about
15 times the state standard for residential soil — 6,300 milligrams of
lead per kilogram of fiber over the state standard for soil of 400
milligrams of lead. A sample taken of the green turf fibers of Old
Tappan’s field was 10 times the state standard.
The state
recommends restricting the use of fields for children under the age of
7. If the fields are used, they should be watered down to suppress dust
and hand, body and clothes should be washed thoroughly. The most
conservative recommendation is to close the field.
A statement by
FieldTurf Tarkett of Montreal, Canada, which installed both Northern
Valley fields six years ago, said the company was “astonished’’ by the
findings, given that the state health department tested 10 FieldTurf
fields this spring and found “very low or undetectable levels of lead.’’
“As
an industry leader in the synthetic turf industry with more than 2,500
installed fields around the world, FieldTurf is fundamentally dedicated
to the health and well being of everyone who plays on our fields,’’ the
statement reads.
FieldTurf is working with the Northern Valley to
verify the results and wants to conduct its own tests, said spokesman
Elliot Sloane.
The field closures could mean finding new
on-campus locations for graduations on June 19 in Demarest and June 20
in Old Tappan, said Superintendent Jan Furman.
Four turf samples
from each school’s field on May 21 were tested, said Gary Leverence,
president of Environmental Remediation & Management, Inc. of
Trenton. Each field had one sample with elevated lead levels. The
results showed the lead is contained within the product used to dye the
fields green, he said.
When she received the results on Friday, Furman closed the fields, which cost $700,000 each to install.
ER&M
is performing more tests at the two fields: of the sand underneath the
fields to determine if lead has leached beneath the turf and on dust
from the field, which is collected from shoes. Results should be
available by the end of the week.
Northern Valley hired ER&M
after the state tested turf from about a dozen municipal parks and
colleges and found elevated levels at fields in Hoboken and Ewing. A
Newark field tested for high levels last summer. The turf was replaced
at those sites.
The turf industry contends the potential harm to children is overstated.
Lead
chromate has been used in some dyes to keep the green color of the
blades from fading in the sunlight. The industry is moving to phase
lead out as an ingredient, said Rick Doyle, president of the Synthetic
Turf Council.
But Doyle said experts hired by the industry have
determined that the lead chromate in the fields is insoluble and
encapsulated, meaning that it won’t leach into the soil below and can’t
be absorbed into the body.
The industry claims that a 50 pound
child would have to ingest 100 pounds of synthetic turf to be at risk
of absorbing more than the recommended standard for lead, Doyle said.
“At the end of the day, we are still saying that this turf is safe,” Doyle said.
Parent
Peggy Blumenthal, whose 17-year-old son Sean has played soccer on the
Demarest turf field, said state and federal agencies should have
required lead testing statewide long ago.
“If state is coming
down now saying we think there’s a problem, why didn’t they come down
six years ago and do the research before it’s a problem, before
everybody has it down?’’ she asked.
“What are we supposed to do
as parents?’’ said the Haworth resident. “Do I take my child for lead
testing? Do you get a blood test or urine test? What are you supposed
to do? Accept it and see what happens 10 years down the road?’’
GRASS VS. SYNTHETIC
A
debate has been raging for several years in the United States and
Europe over whether artificial turf improves or worsens the environment.
Pro
* Minimal watering needed, only on hot days to cool playing surface.
* No fertilizer runoff into surrounding waters.
* No need for weedkillers and other pesticides.
* More than 25 million tires kept out of landfills, crushed and used as fill on synthetic fields.
Con
*
Chemicals. Activist groups call for more testing of not just lead
content but of whether the chemical ingredients in crumb rubber can
leach into the environment, give off gas or be ingested when they get
on children's hands.
* Runoff. Water flows off turf just like
pavement, creating another impervious surface that could potentially
damage surrounding wetlands and streams.
* Ground warming. Turf fields can overheat on hot days, creating mini heat islands.
* Disposal. When fields wear out, the fake grass and other materials likely will end up in landfills.
Comments
geoffreyvector
Jul 15 2008, 10:54 AM
I'd like to share my feelings as a concerned parent and say that I am quite disappointed with the media and how it has handled this issue regarding lead in the turf. The media has evidently released information which happens to be misleading and in some cases, absolutely false. I'd like to say that, specifically, that FieldTurf has not only given myself and my children the opportunity to play sports on a high-performance, safe and consistent surface year round, but they have helped save our community hundreds of thousands of dollars that would have otherwise been spent on maintaining natural grass fields. Back to the lead issue: it happens to be that in almost everything containing color or dyes, they also contain lead in some capacity. In fact, most of the toys that my children play with have some lead in them. In addition to toys, one's tiled flooring contains more lead in them than a FieldTurf surface, yet we don't hesitate to walk barefoot on such materials. The most important issue is the one dealing with the lead leaching. Although I have some background in chemistry, you don't need to be a chemist to understand that if the lead traces or whatever else they claim to be within the field does not leach, and considering that fact, there is nothing to worry about! It would take a laboratory, a controlled environment and an extreme and unnatural temperature to release and break down any of the compounds or chemicals that were contained in the product. If you really want to talk about hazardous, then we should focus on the pesticides that our kids play in on a regular basis on most of the natural grass fields. I am very concerned with the environment, but in all seriousness, FieldTurf, as an artificial turf product, probably does ten times more for the overall good of the planet than plain old natural grass fields do. As an educated and informed parent and athlete I am saying that there is absolutely nothing to worry about with regards to artificial turf, and that with all the demand for sports, we would greatly benefit if there were more FieldTurf fields installed.
Angela Flynn
Jul 15 2008, 05:16 PM
I have not looked into this issue, but I am against artificial turf on principal. I think it is best to have an organic surface on as much surface of the planet as possible.
I have included some clips from a news article and wikipedia. While the article claims that the lead is encapsulated and this reduces bioavailability this does not mean that it is not available or that certain conditions such as heat and wear may increase the availability. Here in Santa Cruz we were aerially sprayed with a synthetic pheromone that was encapsulated and therefore "could not" harm us. I, and many other people, had adverse health reactions from the spray.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9677643...they found lead levels high enough to potentially exceed the state's upper limit of 0.5 micrograms per day of lead exposure. People ingest lead through hand-to-mouth contact, or through skin contact with the turf or dust from it....
..."Lead chromate is not like the regular lead you would get from paint," she explained. "It's encapsulated to reduce any aspect of bioavailability." Bioavailability refers to the ability of a substance, like lead, to become biologically active when it's ingested, absorbed or inhaled.
Health experts take seriously the health effects of lead exposure, particularly in children. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that more than 300,000 U.S. children have elevated blood levels of lead. It harms the nervous system, and studies show it can also impair the immune system. Excess lead exposure in children is linked to lowered IQ and test scores, memory problems, hyperactivity and behavioral problems, including juvenile delinquency. In adults, it's associated with cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure and kidney failure in those with chronic kidney disease, as well as with Lou Gehrig's disease.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_turf#AdvantagesAdvantages
Artificial turf can be a better solution when the environment is particularly hostile to natural grass. An arid environment or one where there is little natural light are examples.
Ideal for holiday homes when maintenance of lawns is not practical. It is also a solution for elderly homeowners who find the upkeep of lawns too much hard work.
Suitable for roof gardens and swimming pool surrounds.
Artificial turf pitches can last up to ten years.
Some artificial turf systems allow for the integration of fiber-optic fibers into the turf. This would allow for lighting or advertisements to be directly embedded in a playing surface, or runway lighting to be embedded in artificial landing surfaces for aircraft.[7]
Disadvantages
The abrasions caused by artificial turf have been linked to a higher incidence of MRSA infections [8].
Some artificial turf requires infill such as silicon sand and/or granulated rubber made from recycled car tires. This material may carry heavy metals which can leach into the water table.[9]
Periodic disinfection is required as pathogens are not broken down by natural processes in the same manner as natural turf. Despite this, recent studies suggest certain microbial life is less active.[10]
Turf toe is a medical condition which is often associated with playing on artificial turf pitches.
Friction between skin and artificial turf causes abrasions and/or burns to a much greater extent than natural grass.[10] This is an issue for some sports: for example, football in which sliding maneuvers are common and clothing does not fully cover the limbs. However, with some third-generation artifical grasses, this is almost completely eliminated by the use of polyethylene yarn.
Artificial turf tends to be much hotter than natural grass when exposed to the sun.[11]
Many players claim that the lack of "give" in artificial turf leads to strain and injury in the legs, especially amongst players used to playing on natural grass. Some players refuse to play on artificial turf, and there have been cases of players not signing with a particular team for fear of damaging their legs by playing on artificial turf.[citation needed]
--------------------
seanadelsohn
Jul 25 2008, 04:12 PM
In light of the recent press surrounding “lead and artificial turf??, we at FieldTurf have compiled a comprehensive review of the facts which confirm the safety of the FieldTurf artificial turf system. I urge you to review them at
http://www.fieldturf.com/leadissues/Sincerely,
Sean Adelsohn
FieldTurf
Angela Flynn
Jul 26 2008, 01:50 AM
I still have to say that I am against synthetic turf. I realize the desire of having a year round playing surface and I get the benefits of not having to water, fertilize and use pesticides on natural turf, but I wonder about the ecology of the land. It seems that we try to create sterile environments and I do not think this is healthy. What of the microorganisms, insects, worms, etc that a natural field supports?
I also feel that the human desire to have every convenience comes with a price. Just what happens to this stuff after its useful life is over? It seems that it will be a toxic waste product. And what if there is a fire? It seems the fumes would be toxic as well.
Granted I do not know much on the bioavailability of the lead in lead chromate, but I do think it was a good move for your company to stop using it. It seems that the abstract from the journal I copied below indicates that there is some toxicity associated with lead chromate.
http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodi...ticle/abstractsInduction of apoptotic cell death by particulate lead chromate: differential effects of vitamins C and E on genotoxicity and survival.
MEDLINE
CITATION ALERT
EXPORT CITATION
EMAIL TO A COLLEAGUE
RELATED RECORDS
Blankenship LJ, Carlisle DL, Wise JP, Orenstein JM, Dye LE, Patierno SR
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997; 146:270-80.
Abstract
Certain hexavalent chromium compounds are documented human carcinogens. Exposure of cells to particulate forms of chromium results in cell-enhanced dissolution of particles in the extracellular microenvironment and chronic production of chromium oxyanions, which are taken up by the cell through an anion transport system and are genotoxic and clastogenic. It was previously shown that apoptosis is the mode of cell death of nearly all of the Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-AA8 cell line), which die after high-dose, short-term treatments with soluble sodium chromate. In this report the mode of cell killing by particulate lead chromate and of low-dose continuous treaments of soluble sodium chromate designed to mimic conditions of ionic chromate uptake after lead chromate exposure was examined. CHO-AA8 cells were treated for 24 hr with doses of sodium chromate or lead chromate which cause a 50% decrease in survival in colony-forming effeciency assays. Longer treatments (up to 72 hr) at the same doses did not decrease survival further than the 24-hr exposure. Morphological changes indicative of apoptosis, as well as internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, were detectable by 24 hr after treatment with lead chromate or soluble sodium chromate. All of the cells killed by treatments with lead chromate particles underwent apoptosis as the mode of cell death and this was accurately modeled in cell culture by continuous treatments with low-dose soluble sodium chromate. Exposure of cells to hexavalent chromium compounds causes a spectrum of DNA damage which can be selectively altered by pretreatment of cells with antioxidant vitamins prior to chromium exposure. Here we show that ascorbate and alpha-tocopherol markedly inhibited the chromosomal aberrations induced by both particulate and soluble chromate compounds, even though chromium adduct levels were not decreased by either vitamin pretreatment. Cell survival assays showed that ascorbate, but not alpha-tocopherol, protected cells from apoptosis induced by sodium chromate. The results differentiate chromium-induced apoptosis from both chromosomal damage and adduct levels and suggest that other lesions sensitive to ascorbate but not tocopherol are the proximal inducing signal for chromium-induced apoptosis.
--------------------
seanadelsohn
Today, 11:55 AM
In light of the recent press surrounding “lead and artificial turf??, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) took it upon themselves to conduct thorough testing of several artificial turf fields. After carefully examining the results, CPSC spokeswoman Julie Vallese said “parents should not be concerned about harmful levels of lead in artificial turf “and that “our message is: go out and play.??
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08348.htmlIn addition, we at FieldTurf have compiled a comprehensive review of the facts which confirm the results presented by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and validate the safety of the FieldTurf artificial turf system. I urge you to review them at
http://www.fieldturf.com/leadissues/Sincerely,
Sean Adelsohn
FieldTurf
Add a Comment
Comment on this story in the OCA Forum and your comment will also be added here.
Requires a valid OCA Forum username and password.