• AFL-CIO
    confident of gains [Washington Times]
    The
    government affairs director of the AFL-CIO said he is certain that organized
    labor’s top priority – a law that would make it much easier for unions to
    organize businesses both large and small – will pass Congress and be signed by
    President Barack Obama.
  • Employment
    Law: The Shifting Legal Landscape [Human Resource Executive Online]
    The
    2009 agenda for HR professionals must assume EFCA in some form will become law.
    In anticipation, employers should consider auditing conditions to determine
    whether they would support an organizing drive; monitoring union-organizing
    activities within the industry or geographical location; training management
    about rules associated with union organizing, potentially providing employees
    with information and arguments about union representation when organizing
    activity is anticipated and — in some highly targeted industries — even before
    receiving evidence of organizing activity; and, most of all, reviewing overall
    employment conditions to ensure they are competitive and the needs of employees
    are being addressed.
  • The
    Employee Free Choice Act: What’s At Stake [Progress Illinois]
    In
    1980, the United Labor Unions set out to organize employees at Detroit fast food
    chains in the hopes of sparking a nationwide movement to unionize the workforce
    in this fast-growing industry.  As a rookie organizer working on the campaign, I
    learned firsthand what is at stake when workers stand up for better wages,
    healthcare, and a voice on the job.
  • Column:
    The Tear-Down [Huffington Post]
    I
    guess they must prefer the Wal-Mart model, where full-time workers (and Wal-Mart
    defines “full-time” as 34 hours per week) make just $19,200 annually. Of course
    it is their privilege to believe that a low-wage economy is the right path for
    21st-century America. But then let’s hear no more from them about bottom-up
    economic stimulus. There is no real bottom-up approach that even begins to
    compare with strengthening, not destroying, workers’ bargaining
    power.