Michael Specter’s New Book ‘Denialism’ Misses its Targets

Like the great institutions of European Christianity, modern science has amassed tremendous power-and not always lived up to its founding creeds. Science needs someone who appreciates its intellectual grandeur and potential, but who also can train...

October 31, 2009 | Source: Grist Magazine | by Tom Philpott

[Excerpt]…Specter blithely ignores the political economy of science as it is
practiced. That oversight severely limits the value of his book.

But there’s another, even more glaring oversight at work here. In a
book devoted to “denialism,” and “how irrational thinking hinders
scientific progress, harms the planet, and threatens our lives,” there
is almost no discussion of the most powerful and successful of all the
denier cliques: those who insist human-induced climate change is a hoax.

So what do we find in these pages? We get a chapter defending the
pharmaceutical industry against critics who question its wares—an
industry with nearly $300 billion in sales in the U.S. alone, and fast-growing markets overseas. Specter’s defense aside, Big Pharma typically vies with “oil and mining” and “commercial banks” for the title of most profitable industry in the United States.

There’s a chapter decrying those who question the necessity of
vaccinations—even as global child vaccine rates continue to rise.
(Indeed, according to a recent report, the main factor holding vaccines back isn’t denialism, but rather their heightened cost.)

We get a chapter lambasting what Specter calls the “organic
fetish”—even though organic food sales remain less than 5 percent of
the U.S. market (as Specter acknowledges). But really, this chapter
(more on which below) amounts to a ringing defense of genetically
modified organisms—which can now be found in 75 percent+ of the
offerings on supermarket shelves.

Another chapter blasts the herbal remedy and supplement market—substantial at $23 billion in sales per year (according to this report), but still a fraction of the pharma market’s size.

In other words, Specter mainly trains his sights on unsuccessful or
marginally empowered “deniers,” such as those challenging the pharma
behemoth or vaccines for children.

But what about the
successful deniers—the ones who have managed to block any meaningful response to climate change from the federal government, and are
even now fouling
up the effort to pass an effective climate bill? These folks, part of a
loosely concerted movement funded largely by the oil and coal
industries, get barely a mention in
Denialism; they certainly don’t rate a chapter.

The book’s index has no entry for “climate change.” The entry for
“Global warming” cites just one page—a reference to genetically
modified foods as a “solution” to global warming.