The ad was ominous: A stern portrait of Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with a missile launching skyward behind his right shoulder. Below were the logos of the entire continuum of Jewish organizations in the United States, 17 in all, including all four major denominations.

The message was clear – national security and Israel’s safety are at risk.

The threat? U.S. energy policy.

The full page advertisement in Friday’s New York Times was simply the latest example of diverse groups rallying together for and against climate policy. Organizations from across the American political spectrum, from hunters to retirees to evangelical Hispanic clergy are finding common ground on an issue that has left the Capitol – and many state legislatures – polarized and paralyzed.

Last week, Politico.com published a joint call by the heads of the Christian Coalition and the National Wildlife Federation to break energy gridlock in Congress, saying the two groups share “common interest” in building a bipartisan energy plan. This past summer, 30 national “hook and bullet” groups – representing hunters and anglers of all political stripes – sent a letter to House members urging action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The Congress of Racial Equality – one of the oldest civil rights groups – has partnered with evangelical Christian groups and seniors organizations to decry the harmful economic impacts of pending cap-and-trade legislation.

“For some reason we’ve had a struggle getting the environmental message out of the environmental frame,” said Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation. “That’s what we’re trying to do here – get people to think in a different frame.”

Those building these coalitions say that climate and energy policy is an easy sell once they connect the dots from climate change or energy reform to self-interest for different constituents. The effort requires some tight-rope walking, they acknowledge, and risks resulting in a watered-down appeal to the least-common denominator.

But sometimes the results are surprisingly assertive and cohesive.

The New York Times ad, for instance, links America’s fossil fuel addiction to Iran’s development of nuclear weapons. Domestic dependence on foreign oil drives up prices worldwide, it notes, enriching the treasuries of foreign regimes that hold “anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments.” It is mute on pending climate legislation. But it calls for a comprehensive energy policy to avoid the destabilizing effects of fossil fuel use and climate change.

“There would be different positions (within the coalition) on any climate change bill,” said Rabbi Steve Gutow, president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, which spearheaded the ad. “There is no differing position on the idea that anything that comes forth needs to have energy policy consideration at the highest levels.”