Obama’s War: Failure, Not Progress, in Afghanistan

The White House is using its December review to try to spin the disastrous Afghanistan War plan by citing "progress" in the military campaign, but the available facts paint a picture of a war that's not making us safer and that's not worth the cost.

December 15, 2010 | Source: Alternet | by Robert Greenwald

The White House is using its December review to try to spin the disastrous Afghanistan War plan by citing “progress” in the military campaign, but the available facts paint a picture of a war that’s not making us safer and that’s not worth the cost.

Let’s take a look at just the very broad strokes of the information. After more than nine years and a full year of a massive escalation policy:

* the insurgency continues to gain in size and strength,  
* more U.S. troops are dying than ever,  
* more civilians are dying than ever,  
* violence in the country continues to spike,  
* Pakistan is playing a double game with the U.S. and  
* the military strategy lacks credible prospects for a turnaround.

And yet, we are told we can expect a report touting security gains and “progress,” and that there’s virtually zero chance of any significant policy change from this review. It sort of begs the question: just what level of catastrophe in Afghanistan would signal that we need a change in direction?