For related articles and more information, please visit OCA's Mad Cow Resource page.
Dr. Michael Hansen, senior scientist at Consumers Union, the advocacy arm of Consumer Reports, and an expert in mad cow, is available for comment on the mad cow story.
MICHAEL HANSEN, PHD, CONSUMERS UNION - Statement on BSE positive cow
Consumers Union is seriously concerned by the announcement today of a new case of mad cow disease in a cow from Central California. This raises three important questions about the safety of US beef.
First, the USDA testing program for mad cow disease is way too small. USDA only tests some 40,000 cows a year of the millions slaughtered annually. So we really don't know if this is an isolated unusual event or whether there are more cases in US beef. Our monitoring program is just too small.
Second, detection of BSE is needlessly hindered by the fact that USDA prohibits private companies from testing their own beef. Private testing could augment USDA testing and provide an extra measure of monitoring and assurance of safety to consumers. USDA only tests cattle that are sent to the renderer and doesn't test at slaughterhouses. We find it hard to understand why USDA prohibits private companies from testing.
Third, the ruminant to ruminant feed ban in the US to prevent spread of mad cow disease is inadequate. Cows can't be fed to other cows, which is a good thing. But remains of cows can be fed to pigs and chickens, and pig and chicken remains can be fed back to cows. We believe this could allow for the spread of mad cow disease.
=============== END of CU Statement
Here are John Stauber's two last pieces on this subject, from some years ago, but worth reading:
The book, first published in 1997 - 15 years ago - is here, Mad Cow USA:
Consumer's Union on Announcement Today of a Confirmed Mad Cow in California
Statement on BSE positive cow
By Michael Hansen
Consumers Union, Posted April 25, 2012
Straight to the Source