Sign the Petition:
Search OCA:
Get Local!

Find Local News, Events & Green Businesses on OCA's State Pages:

OCA News Sections

Organic Consumers Association

Who Should You Believe When It Comes to the Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods?

For related articles and more information, please visit OCA's Genetic Engineering page and our Millions Against Monsanto page.

Controversy and genetic engineering go together like peanut butter and jelly, so naturally, there's another brouhaha over genetically engineered (GE) crops in the news. Back in 2011, a French study led by Gilles-Eric Seralini found that rats fed Monsanto's GE corn were more likely to develop tumors than rats fed non-GE corn. The study was published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, the same journal that routinely publishes Monsanto's own studies finding that its GE corn is safe to feed to rats. Now, over two years later, the journal retracted the Seralini study.

So what's going on? Does GE corn give rats tumors? How about people? And how do Americans, the vast majority of whom are not scientists, know what is safe to eat? Here's a look at what the Seralini study found, why it should not have been retracted, and how to tell the difference between valid and bogus claims about GE food.

Both Monsanto and Seralini's feeding studies follow the same general model. Get a large group of a type of rats called Sprague-Dawley and divide them into groups. Feed some groups GE corn and feed the others non-GE corn. Occasionally test their blood and urine, and watch to see if any get sick and die. At the end of the study, euthanize the remaining rats and dissect them to check their organs. Pretty simple, right?

Here are the differences. Monsanto studied its rats for only 90 days, but Seralini studied the rats for two years. Monsanto used twice as many rats - 20 male rats and 20 female rats in each group - as Seralini.

Then there's the corn used. Both studied a variety of Roundup Ready corn called NK603. (Roundup Ready means that the corn resists Monsanto's herbicide Roundup, so cornfields can be sprayed by Roundup, killing the weeds and leaving the corn alive.) In addition to the Roundup Ready corn that was sprayed by Roundup, as a control they used what's known as a "near isoline." A near isoline means corn that is genetically identical to the Roundup Ready corn, with the exception of the Roundup Ready gene. The near isoline corn was grown in the same location at the same time as the Roundup Ready corn, so they would be as similar as possible.      


>>> Read the Full Article

For more information on this topic or related issues you can search the thousands of archived articles on the OCA website using keywords: