Search OCA:
Get Local!

Find Local News, Events,
and Green Businesses on
OCA's New State Pages:

OCA News Sections:
Orgánicos al DíaNoticias y campañas de la OCA en español
Intern with OCA!
SUPPORT OUR
SPONSORS

Intelligent Nutrients

Intelligent Nutrients

The Organic Harmonic Science of Health and Beauty

Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps

Dr. Bronner's
Magic Soaps

Best Selling Organic Soap in the US

Botani Organic

Botani Organic

Organic, Naturally Occurring Vitamins & Supplements

Aloha Bay

Aloha Bay

Organic Palm Wax Candles and Himalayan Salts

Working Assets

Working Assets

Making it easy to make a difference

Eden Organics

Eden Foods

Nurturing more than 350 North American organic family farms

Ode Magazine

Ode Magazine

Smile, Laugh and Cry with Ode

Frey Vineyards

Frey Vineyards

America's Oldest Organic Winery

Organic Valley

Organic Valley

Co-op of Family Farmers Providing Organic Dairy

Starbucks Causes Stir with Ban on Dairy Products from Cows Injected with Monsanto's Bovine Growth Hormone

  • Starbucks causes stir with Posilac ban
    By Bob Krauter
    Capital Press (subscription) - Salem,OR, Jan 22, 2007
    Straight to the Source

Web Note: Despite dairy industry misinformation (see quotes below at end of article), milk from dairy cows injected with Monsanto's controversial genetically engineered hormone, recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (or Posilac) contains significantly higher levels of a potent cancer tumor promoter, called IGF-1, that increases human risks for cancer. This is one of the main reasons why rBGH is banned in nearly every industrialized country in the world, except for the US.  Bovine Growth Hormone is also banned worldwide on organic dairy farms. -- Ronnie Cummins

Starbucks is regionally dropping milk products from cows treated with rBGH, a hormone to encourage milk production. The change affects stores in Northern California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho and several others in the West and in New England.

The decision by Starbucks to drop dairy products from cows treated with an artificial growth hormone is stirring controversy in the West's dairy lands. The Seattle-based Starbucks Corp. is cutting milk, half-and-half, whipped cream and other liquid dairy products made using the bovine growth hormone, known as rBGH, from its drink menu. The decision increases by 27 percent the purchases of non-rBST dairy products by Starbucks compared to the 2006 fiscal year. It affects stand-alone Starbucks stores in Northern California, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Alaska, Montana, New Mexico and in New England.

Dairy groups and biotech experts were distressed, but not surprised by the decision.

Dr. Peggy Lemaux, a UC Berkeley professor and Cooperative Extension biotech specialist, called Starbuck's move a marketing decision.

"It is a matter of choice. Consumers should have the choice either way. Whether they do or don't want it, that's their choice," Lemaux said. "Doing it for the reason that people want that as opposed to --- 'oh, my God, it could be dangerous' --- are two different issues. The latter is simply not true. But if people want it because it makes them feel warm and fuzzy inside, then OK, a farmer ought to do it if it brings him more money."

Lemaux said the biotech debate has been relatively quiet recently. "When there isn't a new issue, often people who feel in their hearts this is right thing - not to use genetically engineered hormones, they stir something up that has been lying dormant for a while," Lemaux said. "For me, that's what this appears to be."

Monsanto Co., the St. Louis-based firm that produces Posilac, defended its product. Monsanto spokesman Andrew Burchett said the Starbucks decision works against farmers, consumers and the environment.

"It implies that there is something wrong with the vast majority of the milk that is out there today. That is bad for the dairy industry," he said. "Farmers who choose to use Posilac --- and it is a choice - farmers who choose to use it to make a living lose access to a tool that helps them make a living."

He estimates that about a third of the dairy cows in the U.S. herd are in herds where Posilac is used. Burchett said Monsanto's customers are "very representative of the range of herd size and demographics" in the U.S. dairy industry.

"As U.S. farmers are able to use products like Posilac to produce more milk with fewer animals, it does reduce the impact on the environment," Burchett said. "Starbuck's procurement policy appears to encourage less efficient use of natural resources to produce milk. That's something that is of concern too."

Michael Marsh, CEO of Western United Dairymen, based in Modesto, said the whole issue of rBST in milk products is moot.

"No milk in the United States can be served anywhere if it has rBST or rGBH in it. And it is not," he said. "The only way that would occur is if you had somebody adulterate the product after it was processed at the milk processing plant."

Posilac is a management tool to stimulate milk production but does not go into the milk, Marsh said. The product is a synthetic version of the hormone naturally occurring in the cow.

"It is a good opportunity to charge consumers more for something they weren't going to get anyway," Marsh said of Starbuck's decision.

For more information on this topic or related issues you can search the thousands of archived articles on the OCA website using keywords:

Become an OCA Member! Sign up below:

First Name
Last Name
Email
Email Preference
Phone
Street
Street 2
City
State
Zip
Country

Add a Comment

Comment on this story in the OCA Forum and your comment will also be added here.
Requires a valid OCA Forum username and password.

OCA Forum Username:
OCA Forum Password:
Register     |     I Forgot My Password