SUPPORT OUR
SPONSORS
Wal-Mart's Crimes Against Forests
-
By Al Norman
Huffington Post, December 19, 2007
Straight to the Source
from Alternet.org
If a tree falls in the forest, will Wal-Mart hear the sound?
Apparently not, according to an environmental investigative report released this week on Wal-Mart's unsustainable timber procurement practices. The new study says Wal-Mart's "good wood" procurement policy only looks good on paper.
Last month, Wal-Mart released a 59-page "Sustainability" progress report, in which the company said "we want to provide our customers with the assurance that not only are they getting value and quality, but they are getting a product that was produced in a socially responsible manner." But the retailer's wood procurement policies are basically all bark, and no bite.
Wal-Mart sells wood products ranging from furniture, to picture frames, candle holders, tooth picks and popsicle sticks. The typical Wal-Mart supercenter can carry more than 900 different wood products. Wal-Mart tells the public that "an area of forest the size of a football field is cleared every second. That's 86,400 football fields a day. In tropical forests, it's estimated that 50,000 species become extinct each year because of deforestation." The retailer has a "Forest and Paper Network" that seeks to get its suppliers to convert to certified wood, and to give preference to suppliers who can verify the use of sustainably harvested wood fiber. "When we discover sustainable factory issues, we are committed to seeking alternatives," the company says, "or even removing products from shelves."
Based on this pledge, the Simplicity corporation should expect a call any day now from Wal-Mart, pulling Simplicity's wooden cribs from its shelves. An undercover study released this week by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), a non-profit research agency based in Washington, D.C., says that despite the company's rhetoric about sustainable wood products, "Wal-Mart is turning a blind eye to illegal timber sources in its supply chain which threaten some of the world's last great natural forests."
According to EIA, Wal-Mart does not ask its suppliers where their wood comes from, and the retailer's 'don't ask' policy "is having particularly dangerous consequences for the high conservation value forest of the Russian Far East and the endangered species dependent on them, including the world's largest cat, the Siberian tiger.
Roughly 84 percent of Wal-Mart's wood products, like cribs and toilet seats, are sourced from China, and much of China's lumber is imported from Russia, where as much as 50 percent of the logging is illegal. EIA undercover investigators met with 8 Chinese manufacturers that supply Wal-Mart with wood. EIA asserts that Wal-Mart is focused only on price, and "has not concerned itself with the origin of the timber used for its products." Wal-Mart's supply chain "will contribute to the depletion of Russia's 'protected' forests unless concerted changes are made," the EIA warns.
One supplier EIA examined makes over 200,000 baby cribs for Wal-Mart every year from Russian poplar and birch. EIA employees, posing as wood buyers, learned that Wal-Mart suppliers admitted to paying protection money to the Russian mafia, and to illegal logging. Almost comical is the fact that logs coming into China from Russia have to be offloaded from the railcars, and reloaded onto Chinese railcars, because the Russian train tracks are a different size than the Chinese. When Wal-Mart customers buy these wood products, they are supporting "criminal timber syndicates," the environmental group says.
Wal-Mart has pledged to "develop transparency to the wood fiber source," but EIA replies that the retailer has shown a "lack of concern" about the sustainability of its wood sourcing. Illegally harvested wood is cheaper because it bypasses environmental regulations, permits, labor laws, taxes and tariffs. Illegal lumber also has a negative impact on the American economy. In 2004, illegal timber cost American suppliers $460 million in lost exports to foreign markets, and as much as $700 million in depressed U.S. prices.
The EIA claims that Wal-Mart's drive to squeeze the lowest price from its suppliers encourages illegal logging. "While the company has laid out strong talking points," EIA notes, "it has thus far avoided taking any firm action to eliminate even illegally logged timber from its supply chain, much less to source from sustainably harvested forests." The group says that without concrete goals and more transparency, all Wal-Mart's rhetoric about 'good wood' "cannot yet be taken seriously." EIA documents several case studies of Wal-Mart's "total inattention to the legality of their raw materials."
The EIA report calls on Wal-Mart "to commit to eliminating illegally sourced wood from its supply chain, and to implement a rigorous purchasing policy for wood products that includes auditing and tracking mechanisms." EIA concludes that "the drive for 'everyday low prices' to the exclusion of other questions has a serious cost..The type of logging pervasive in the Russian Far East damages the environment, robs the government of revenue, and promotes corruption. There is nothing sustainable about this model."
Wal-Mart admits "it's difficult to know if the products we source are coming from certified suppliers and are being made using legally sustainable practices." But the EIA says it's not enough for Wal-Mart simply to acknowledge the problem. "It is now time for Wal-Mart to commit to eliminating illegal wood from its shelves, and communicate this policy to its suppliers of furniture, frames, toys, paper and packaging and other wood products," the EIA insists. "Wal-Mart shoppers do not want to be an inadvertent party to forest crimes."
Alexander von Bismarck, the Executive Director of EIA, says, "To have Wal-Mart ignore measures that to the rest of the world seem common sense -- such as asking where your suppliers' wood is from -- has an enormous impact. It undermines the current global efforts to clean up the timber industry. When Wal-Mart fails to implement an entire category of environmental responsibility, it creates demand designed to take advantage of that. This is currently feeding the illegal logging problem." The EIA believes that Wal-Mart has within its power the ability to "limit the destruction of some of our planet's final frontier forests and the wildlife and people who depend upon them."
Today, there are more than 6,800 Wal-Mart stores around the globe (the company recently opened its 3,000th international store), but only 400 remaining Siberian tigers. That's not very sustainable odds.
Al Norman is the author of The Case Against Wal-Mart. Forbes magazine has called him "Wal-Mart's number one enemy."
(C) 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/71103/
If a tree falls in the forest, will Wal-Mart hear the sound?
Apparently not, according to an environmental investigative report released this week on Wal-Mart's unsustainable timber procurement practices. The new study says Wal-Mart's "good wood" procurement policy only looks good on paper.
Last month, Wal-Mart released a 59-page "Sustainability" progress report, in which the company said "we want to provide our customers with the assurance that not only are they getting value and quality, but they are getting a product that was produced in a socially responsible manner." But the retailer's wood procurement policies are basically all bark, and no bite.
Wal-Mart sells wood products ranging from furniture, to picture frames, candle holders, tooth picks and popsicle sticks. The typical Wal-Mart supercenter can carry more than 900 different wood products. Wal-Mart tells the public that "an area of forest the size of a football field is cleared every second. That's 86,400 football fields a day. In tropical forests, it's estimated that 50,000 species become extinct each year because of deforestation." The retailer has a "Forest and Paper Network" that seeks to get its suppliers to convert to certified wood, and to give preference to suppliers who can verify the use of sustainably harvested wood fiber. "When we discover sustainable factory issues, we are committed to seeking alternatives," the company says, "or even removing products from shelves."
Based on this pledge, the Simplicity corporation should expect a call any day now from Wal-Mart, pulling Simplicity's wooden cribs from its shelves. An undercover study released this week by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), a non-profit research agency based in Washington, D.C., says that despite the company's rhetoric about sustainable wood products, "Wal-Mart is turning a blind eye to illegal timber sources in its supply chain which threaten some of the world's last great natural forests."
According to EIA, Wal-Mart does not ask its suppliers where their wood comes from, and the retailer's 'don't ask' policy "is having particularly dangerous consequences for the high conservation value forest of the Russian Far East and the endangered species dependent on them, including the world's largest cat, the Siberian tiger.
Roughly 84 percent of Wal-Mart's wood products, like cribs and toilet seats, are sourced from China, and much of China's lumber is imported from Russia, where as much as 50 percent of the logging is illegal. EIA undercover investigators met with 8 Chinese manufacturers that supply Wal-Mart with wood. EIA asserts that Wal-Mart is focused only on price, and "has not concerned itself with the origin of the timber used for its products." Wal-Mart's supply chain "will contribute to the depletion of Russia's 'protected' forests unless concerted changes are made," the EIA warns.
One supplier EIA examined makes over 200,000 baby cribs for Wal-Mart every year from Russian poplar and birch. EIA employees, posing as wood buyers, learned that Wal-Mart suppliers admitted to paying protection money to the Russian mafia, and to illegal logging. Almost comical is the fact that logs coming into China from Russia have to be offloaded from the railcars, and reloaded onto Chinese railcars, because the Russian train tracks are a different size than the Chinese. When Wal-Mart customers buy these wood products, they are supporting "criminal timber syndicates," the environmental group says.
Wal-Mart has pledged to "develop transparency to the wood fiber source," but EIA replies that the retailer has shown a "lack of concern" about the sustainability of its wood sourcing. Illegally harvested wood is cheaper because it bypasses environmental regulations, permits, labor laws, taxes and tariffs. Illegal lumber also has a negative impact on the American economy. In 2004, illegal timber cost American suppliers $460 million in lost exports to foreign markets, and as much as $700 million in depressed U.S. prices.
The EIA claims that Wal-Mart's drive to squeeze the lowest price from its suppliers encourages illegal logging. "While the company has laid out strong talking points," EIA notes, "it has thus far avoided taking any firm action to eliminate even illegally logged timber from its supply chain, much less to source from sustainably harvested forests." The group says that without concrete goals and more transparency, all Wal-Mart's rhetoric about 'good wood' "cannot yet be taken seriously." EIA documents several case studies of Wal-Mart's "total inattention to the legality of their raw materials."
The EIA report calls on Wal-Mart "to commit to eliminating illegally sourced wood from its supply chain, and to implement a rigorous purchasing policy for wood products that includes auditing and tracking mechanisms." EIA concludes that "the drive for 'everyday low prices' to the exclusion of other questions has a serious cost..The type of logging pervasive in the Russian Far East damages the environment, robs the government of revenue, and promotes corruption. There is nothing sustainable about this model."
Wal-Mart admits "it's difficult to know if the products we source are coming from certified suppliers and are being made using legally sustainable practices." But the EIA says it's not enough for Wal-Mart simply to acknowledge the problem. "It is now time for Wal-Mart to commit to eliminating illegal wood from its shelves, and communicate this policy to its suppliers of furniture, frames, toys, paper and packaging and other wood products," the EIA insists. "Wal-Mart shoppers do not want to be an inadvertent party to forest crimes."
Alexander von Bismarck, the Executive Director of EIA, says, "To have Wal-Mart ignore measures that to the rest of the world seem common sense -- such as asking where your suppliers' wood is from -- has an enormous impact. It undermines the current global efforts to clean up the timber industry. When Wal-Mart fails to implement an entire category of environmental responsibility, it creates demand designed to take advantage of that. This is currently feeding the illegal logging problem." The EIA believes that Wal-Mart has within its power the ability to "limit the destruction of some of our planet's final frontier forests and the wildlife and people who depend upon them."
Today, there are more than 6,800 Wal-Mart stores around the globe (the company recently opened its 3,000th international store), but only 400 remaining Siberian tigers. That's not very sustainable odds.
Al Norman is the author of The Case Against Wal-Mart. Forbes magazine has called him "Wal-Mart's number one enemy."
(C) 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/71103/
Comments
kparcell
Dec 26 2007, 05:40 PM
Left to nations and corportations this situation will almost certainly become worse. The solution is economic reorganization that empowers communities to protect their resources.
http://sunmoney.org
diana
Dec 26 2007, 09:19 PM
OK, I'm not interested in Wal-Mart per se, only in educating people away from it and its devastation of communities. The solution may be "economic reorganization," but at a grass roots level, what does that look like? Are you, Kevin Parcell, working locally? Because that's what interests me, but I'd like to know what works, what might, and what doesn't, before I jump in.
I would like to see if there's interest in a Buy Local movement in my home town. We can have monthly meetings. We can have researchers who create a list of whatever basic goods might be available in local-/ state-/ US-made categories. (Who has snow boots that are US made, and how much are they?) Food, of course, too.
We have a food buyers' club, but it pays a hefty wholesale price -- pennies less than I pay at the grocery store. It might be better to keep that club alive, if barely, and concentrate on getting the local, worker-owned grocer to stock more local, organic, grass-fed, free-range ... merchandise that is difficult to source locally. Or to find enough of, locally. I think I can get eggs and basic breads from my farmer friend on a continuous basis; for meats we have several acceptable options (and a freezer). We need a milk option -- or three. I'm interested in helping to establish a CSA and even working out recipes for more-exotic vegetables (here in the midwest, red cabbage is 'exotic'!).
The ideas are, then, 1) Plant the Buy Local idea bug, setting up meeting time and date (we have the public space and I even have a key); 2) See if there's interest in researching and creating lists of resources for buying locally/ state-wide/ regionally, or US-made; and 3) See what the options and interests are on food.
Should we want to ultimately get involved with scrip? --diana
I would like to see if there's interest in a Buy Local movement in my home town. We can have monthly meetings. We can have researchers who create a list of whatever basic goods might be available in local-/ state-/ US-made categories. (Who has snow boots that are US made, and how much are they?) Food, of course, too.
We have a food buyers' club, but it pays a hefty wholesale price -- pennies less than I pay at the grocery store. It might be better to keep that club alive, if barely, and concentrate on getting the local, worker-owned grocer to stock more local, organic, grass-fed, free-range ... merchandise that is difficult to source locally. Or to find enough of, locally. I think I can get eggs and basic breads from my farmer friend on a continuous basis; for meats we have several acceptable options (and a freezer). We need a milk option -- or three. I'm interested in helping to establish a CSA and even working out recipes for more-exotic vegetables (here in the midwest, red cabbage is 'exotic'!).
The ideas are, then, 1) Plant the Buy Local idea bug, setting up meeting time and date (we have the public space and I even have a key); 2) See if there's interest in researching and creating lists of resources for buying locally/ state-wide/ regionally, or US-made; and 3) See what the options and interests are on food.
Should we want to ultimately get involved with scrip? --diana
Ohiorganic
Dec 27 2007, 12:22 PM
Diana, I am wondering if you should change the name to the buy "American" Club. Especially since hard goods like clothing and appliances likely will not be manufactured locally (within 100 miles). Buy American might light a fire under a lot more people than the hippie/blue state Buy Local idea (which is a great idea).
diana
Dec 27 2007, 11:48 PM
Diana, I am wondering if you should change the name to the buy "American" Club. Especially since hard goods like clothing and appliances likely will not be manufactured locally (within 100 miles). Buy American might light a fire under a lot more people than the hippie/blue state Buy Local idea (which is a great idea).
We could certainly do that! My beloved and I were at the <gasp> mall, as the local downtown doesn't have a men's clothier with the right stuff (and he was exchanging shirts). I go to the mall probably four times a year, and two of those are for meetings, not shopping.
So we went looking for the 'US Made' label. On anything. I stopped at my favorite shoe place -- favorite because I was bemoaning jobs being shipped off and the sales clerk and I ended up having the most wonderful conversation! We stopped by just to chat briefly with her; she so rocks. But even shoes that used to be US made are outsourced.
We went to the supplier for union work boots, and discovered that Red Wing has two boots, virtually identical except that one is made in China -- and is a whopping $15 cheaper ($126 compared to 141 for the union-made US boot). We wondered aloud if most Americans wouldn't pay the extra 12% if they knew that someone was making a decent, union living, especially locally. The only major employer in this town in the railroad, and most of that is union. Yes, most of the guys (they're all guys, they're almost all white; it's wrong but it's what there is to work with right now) will only buy union-made, and most won't shop at Wally World, either, so there is awareness.
Even if we could find sources that are within 500 miles, or 1,000 miles but not shipped by truck (except the last leg of transit), it'd be a plus. Trains are actually decent sources for transport. Given the dire econ straits of this town, we were wondering if making shoes here might be an option ....
Anyway, thank you immensely for the input! --diana
Add a Comment
Comment on this story in the OCA Forum and your comment will also be added here.
Requires a valid OCA Forum username and password.

Noticias
y campañas
de la OCA
en español





