SUPPORT OUR
SPONSORS
Beef's Wake-Up Recall
-
A Year of Problems Has USDA Rethinking Safety Rules
By Annys Shin
Washington Post, December 21, 2007
Straight to the Source
For beef lovers, 2007 will go down as another year of eating dangerously.
Since the spring, meat suppliers have recalled more than 30 million pounds of ground beef contaminated with the potentially lethal bacteria E. coli O157:H7, including the 21.7 million pounds recalled by New Jersey-based Topps Meat in September.
After three relatively quiet years, the 20 recalls this year have raised new doubts about whether the beef industry's attempts to keep the pathogen out of ground beef, and the government's oversight of those efforts, are working.
Agriculture Department officials, who oversee the safety of pork, beef and poultry, say they did not recognize that anything was seriously amiss with the beef supply until the Topps recall hit.
Microbiologists say the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in the environment is highly variable, and no one can say with certainty what caused the spike in outbreaks. In several instances this year, however, USDA officials missed red flags and were slow to correct longstanding deficiencies in the way they monitor beef processors' efforts to contain the pathogen.
USDA officials did not learn that Topps had begun testing its ground beef less frequently until the recall. Recurring sanitation problems at a United Food Group plant in Vernon, Calif., that later recalled 75,000 pounds of ground beef did not trigger further enforcement actions because the agency had not told inspectors what to do about repeat violations. The recall was eventually expanded to 5.7 million pounds. Critics said the agency missed an opportunity to strengthen its early-warning system by not keeping track of every instance when a plant found the dangerous strain of E. coli in raw ground beef.
The department has postponed plans to target inspections at plants that had a record of problems because officials do not know which plants pose the greatest risks.
Similar lapses have surfaced during the seven years since meat processors were required to come up with scientifically based plans to contain and control pathogens. In 2002, USDA officials did not know that the E. coli strain had been detected in ground beef at ConAgra's Greeley, Colo., plant 63 times in the weeks leading up to a massive recall. The agency had been testing for the bacteria in raw ground beef since 1994, but skipped ConAgra's plants under a policy that exempted the largest processors. USDA now tests ground beef at every plant at least once month, while self-testing at plants remains voluntary.
Full Story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/20
/AR2007122002409.html
Since the spring, meat suppliers have recalled more than 30 million pounds of ground beef contaminated with the potentially lethal bacteria E. coli O157:H7, including the 21.7 million pounds recalled by New Jersey-based Topps Meat in September.
After three relatively quiet years, the 20 recalls this year have raised new doubts about whether the beef industry's attempts to keep the pathogen out of ground beef, and the government's oversight of those efforts, are working.
Agriculture Department officials, who oversee the safety of pork, beef and poultry, say they did not recognize that anything was seriously amiss with the beef supply until the Topps recall hit.
Microbiologists say the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in the environment is highly variable, and no one can say with certainty what caused the spike in outbreaks. In several instances this year, however, USDA officials missed red flags and were slow to correct longstanding deficiencies in the way they monitor beef processors' efforts to contain the pathogen.
USDA officials did not learn that Topps had begun testing its ground beef less frequently until the recall. Recurring sanitation problems at a United Food Group plant in Vernon, Calif., that later recalled 75,000 pounds of ground beef did not trigger further enforcement actions because the agency had not told inspectors what to do about repeat violations. The recall was eventually expanded to 5.7 million pounds. Critics said the agency missed an opportunity to strengthen its early-warning system by not keeping track of every instance when a plant found the dangerous strain of E. coli in raw ground beef.
The department has postponed plans to target inspections at plants that had a record of problems because officials do not know which plants pose the greatest risks.
Similar lapses have surfaced during the seven years since meat processors were required to come up with scientifically based plans to contain and control pathogens. In 2002, USDA officials did not know that the E. coli strain had been detected in ground beef at ConAgra's Greeley, Colo., plant 63 times in the weeks leading up to a massive recall. The agency had been testing for the bacteria in raw ground beef since 1994, but skipped ConAgra's plants under a policy that exempted the largest processors. USDA now tests ground beef at every plant at least once month, while self-testing at plants remains voluntary.
Full Story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/20
/AR2007122002409.html
For more information on this topic or related issues you can search the thousands of archived articles on the OCA website using keywords:
Become an OCA Member! Sign up below:
diana
Dec 23 2007, 11:35 AM
The USDA is, foremost, chartered to *promote* US agriculture. That it would also be tasked with the work of protecting consumers is in conflict with its primary mandate. (That we would trust the agency to protect us is rather ludicrous.)
Ohiorganic
Dec 26 2007, 10:01 AM
The USDA is, foremost, chartered to *promote* US agriculture. That it would also be tasked with the work of protecting consumers is in conflict with its primary mandate. (That we would trust the agency to protect us is rather ludicrous.)
But Diana, that flies in the face of the USDA's real job-protecting the big ag/food corps from any responsibility those entities might have towards their customers.
of course we the American people are all at fault for this sort of thing happening when we allow the food giants too much power over what we eat and than become lazy eaters who simply do not care what we ate as long as it's cheap, easy to get whenever we want it and comes in a pretty package.
But we all do have a choice-buy local foods, know where your food comes from who grew it and how.
diana
Dec 26 2007, 02:55 PM
One of the movies I made my family watch yesterday was "The Corporation." My love's almost as old as me
so he, too, can remember being taught to see the government as being basically decent, full of decent people who really were looking out for our best interests, since they were mostly like us. Maybe it was drummed deeper into working class kids, but we were necessary observers of those more class-elite, so maybe we internalized the mythos (and its hope) more. But the teaching seemed about the same.
It's a shock to we carefully-conditioned Americans, then, to realize that the USDA really is mandated to *sell* ag products, to push them on the public, no matter how unsuspecting, and on the rest of the world, as well. Just like it's a shock to even begin to contemplate that maybe 9/11 was really a series of controlled demolitions designed to kill enough of our own citizens to get us into the next bloody war. That the plane-bombs were the next step after the failed underground bomb of some years prior, reputedly planted by the CIA. The plan to reap huge profits for war corporations -- but also for the federal reserve, itself a corporation and not 'federal' at all -- is just too much to digest except in small segments.
And Americans? Dumbed down and dulled out, intent on amassing The Most Toys, but also simply lost as to how to find real happiness in our fractured lives, we follow the shepherds' instructions. We shop Wal-Mart, mindless of the true costs to our fellow citizen and our communities. We buy what's quick and easy (I can't believe how many 'Quick and Sustainable' recipe books I found at the local bookseller's a week ago ... a megachain in a strip mall, because that's all that we have left here in the heartland).
'Buy Local' isn't easy. It isn't quick, or simple or any of those things we think we need. So I intend to do some of that work for other people, to make local connections here in Jellysburg. To find a reasonably-green dairy or three; to find buyers for my farmer friend's eggs and home-grown breads ... and maybe to buy her a bag of organic chicken feed to see what 'her girls' think of it ... ? To talk with the local buyers' club that thinks it's a co-op, to see why I can get so much of the stuff they claim is sold to them priced 'wholesale' for two or three cents more at the Westside Hy-Vee. We need options but they have to be honest, have to make sense, too! --diana
It's a shock to we carefully-conditioned Americans, then, to realize that the USDA really is mandated to *sell* ag products, to push them on the public, no matter how unsuspecting, and on the rest of the world, as well. Just like it's a shock to even begin to contemplate that maybe 9/11 was really a series of controlled demolitions designed to kill enough of our own citizens to get us into the next bloody war. That the plane-bombs were the next step after the failed underground bomb of some years prior, reputedly planted by the CIA. The plan to reap huge profits for war corporations -- but also for the federal reserve, itself a corporation and not 'federal' at all -- is just too much to digest except in small segments.
And Americans? Dumbed down and dulled out, intent on amassing The Most Toys, but also simply lost as to how to find real happiness in our fractured lives, we follow the shepherds' instructions. We shop Wal-Mart, mindless of the true costs to our fellow citizen and our communities. We buy what's quick and easy (I can't believe how many 'Quick and Sustainable' recipe books I found at the local bookseller's a week ago ... a megachain in a strip mall, because that's all that we have left here in the heartland).
'Buy Local' isn't easy. It isn't quick, or simple or any of those things we think we need. So I intend to do some of that work for other people, to make local connections here in Jellysburg. To find a reasonably-green dairy or three; to find buyers for my farmer friend's eggs and home-grown breads ... and maybe to buy her a bag of organic chicken feed to see what 'her girls' think of it ... ? To talk with the local buyers' club that thinks it's a co-op, to see why I can get so much of the stuff they claim is sold to them priced 'wholesale' for two or three cents more at the Westside Hy-Vee. We need options but they have to be honest, have to make sense, too! --diana








