Sept. 11-Two Views from Afghanistan

***Mir Tamim Ansary on Afghanistan

To punish innocent Afghans would be immoral

Date: Sunday, September 16, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: A view from Afghani-American writer

***Mir Tamim Ansary on Afghanistan

I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone
Age." Ronn Owens [2], on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this would mean
killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this atrocity,
but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What else can we
do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether we "have the
belly to do what must be done."

And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am
from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never
lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will
listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.

I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no doubt
in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in New York.
I agree that something must be done about those monsters.

But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who
took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a
plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think
Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in
the concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing
to do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of the perpetrators.
They would exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban and
clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their country.

Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A few
years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000 disabled
orphans in Afghanistan , a country with no economy, no food. There are
millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these widows alive in
mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the farms were all
destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the Afghan
people have not overthrown the Taliban.

We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age.
Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already. Make the
Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses? Done. Turn
their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their hospitals? Done.
Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine and health care?
Too late. Someone already did all that.

New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at least
get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat,
only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away and hide. Maybe
the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they don't move too
fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping
bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the criminals who did this
horrific thing. Actually it would only be making common cause with the
Taliban--by raping once again the people they've been raping all this time

So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with true
fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with
ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what needs to be
done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as
needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing innocent
people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's actually on the table
is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans would die fighting
their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than
that folks. Because to get any troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go
through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan
would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see
where I'm going. We're flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.

And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants.
That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right
there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem
ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam and the
West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust in those
lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even better
from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the end the west
would win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last for years and
millions would die, not just theirs but ours. Who has the belly for that?
Bin Laden does. Anyone else?

Mir Tamim Ansary
__________________________________________________________________________

Date: Sunday, September 16, 2001 5:15 AM
Subject: To punish innocent Afghans would be immoral

To punish innocent Afghans would be immoral /14.09.01

Chris Buckley, Christian Aid Programme Officer for Afghanistan

I have just returned from Afghanistan, and cannot avoid a growing feeling of
dread at what may be about to befall the people I have left there. The
bellicose statements being issued by America and her allies about revenge
and retaliation for Tuesday's horrific terrorist attacks against New York
and Washington seem to be softening up western electorates for some kind of
massive military action against the Afghan people.

Because of these threats, aid organisations have been forced to pull out
their foreign workers ­ fearing both that they may be caught in the expected
raids, or that they would be attacked as westerners after the NATO bombers
have flown away. The effects of this withdrawal could be infinitely more
tragic and devastating than the worst that a wounded America may now throw
at this long, long-suffering country.

For, although it has gone largely unreported, Afghanistan is in the grip of
a three-year drought and on the verge of mass starvation. According to the
UN-run World Food Programme, by the end of the year 5.5 million people will
be entirely dependent on food aid to survive the winter ­ that¹s a quarter
of the Afghan population.

As Christian Aid¹s programme officer responsible for Afghanistan, I have
been helping supply food and seeds to communities in desperate need. In a
few weeks the winter snows will come, cutting off the hundreds of isolated
villages whose only links to the outside world are rutted dirt tracks.
Without seeds they will be unable to replant for next year. Without food aid
now, thousands could be dead before the spring.

Already fears on the ground about this pending catastrophe are filtering
through.Only yesterday (Thurs) I received this message from one of the local
organisations funded by Christian Aid.

'What will happen to the people if aid agencies remain reluctant to resume
full operations? The consequences are quite clear that people who are
already suffering would be the victims. And if any military action is taken,
Afghan staff and civilians will be in real danger.

'Terrorism is the worst thing and it shows how blind these people are as
human beings. But if the leaders do not have patience and tolerance they can
only do further damage.'

This, I think you must agree, is not a voice from a country of dedicated
international terrorists or religious fanatics. But it is a voice from the
real Afghanistan, unrecognisable from the demonised image we are being urged
to accept.

The real Afghanistan is one where 85 per cent of the population are
subsistence farmers. Most Afghans don't have newspapers, television sets or
radios. They will not have heard of the World Trade Centre or the Pentagon,
and most will have no idea that a group of zealots has attacked these icons
of western civilisation. There isn't even a postal service.

Now, in these isolated villages, families are down to their last few weeks
of food and already men women and children in the bulging refugee camps are
dying of cholera and malnutrition. I have spoken to orphans with swollen
bellies. I have spoken to men who have no money to hire trucks to escape the
drought and make it to the camps. I have spoken to families who say they
will wait in their villages for death.

And that was before the aid agencies were forced to withdraw. Afghans are
not willing victims - they are hardy peoples, as any Soviet general will
testify. For the past three years they have been doing all they can to
survive - sharing food, borrowing money to buy food, crossing the borders
with Pakistan and Iran to find illegal, badly-paid work. Many used to work
on the opium farms as casual labourers.

But all these sources of income have dried up. Pakistan and Iran are
throwing thousands of Afghans out each month, the Taliban have banned opium
production and there is no food or credit to be had after three years of
drought.

And as I write this, our worst fears have just been realised. I have just
received the following message from a friend who works for another of our
partner organisations in western Afghanistan. He writes: 'I hope you are
fine. We have spoken to the World Food Programme in Herat, and asked them to
release food so we can distribute it to our beneficiaries who are in severe
need. But WFP has stopped their activities right now. Could you please see
if it is possible to get the release from WFP?'

That is a real cry for help. Other friends there have stressed the need for
the world to adopt a comprehensive approach to the terrorist threat ­
addressing the underlying causes of this terrifying phenomenon rather than
just seeking to extract revenge.

Let me be clear. The murder of thousands of innocent Americans has shocked
and appalled us all. But any military action which disrupts the flow of aid
to millions of equally innocent Afghans would be equally immoral.

Christian Aid urges everyone involved to show civilised restraint in
responding to an act of barbarism. Thousands of innocent people have died in
the United States. We must now make sure that even more innocent lives are
not lost.