Search OCA
Get Local!

Global Consumer Pressure Keeps Australia from Producing GE Crops

Headline: FEATURE-Australia shrinks from GM crops
Wire Service: RTw (Reuters World Report)
Date: Thu, Oct 14, 1999

By Michael Byrnes
SYDNEY, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Australia's A$22 billion ($14.3 billion)
farm export industry, which serves up a big helping of the world's traded
food, is wary of rushing into genetically modified (GM) crops and risking a
consumer backlash.
Items declared off the GM list for now are ingredients for a wide
range of foodstuffs from bread to beer to cooking oil -- and include sugar,
wheat, barley and canola.
Australia's A$3 billion ($1.95 billion) a year beef industry, which
exports around the world but mainly to Asia, is also GM free, although
anxiously watching whether other cattle-producing countries venture into
genetically engineered steaks.
As Australian and New Zealand health ministers prepare to meet next
week to decide whether to introduce some of the toughest labelling laws in
the world on GM foods, Australia's farm sector faces a dilemma.
"If GM proves its worth and becomes a valuable production technique
overseas and Australia doesn't adopt it, it could well spell the end of
Australia as the world's leading (beef) exporter," said one industry
source, who asked not to be named.
TRANSGENIC BEEF COULD CLOSE CHICKEN'S TIME LEAD
Stakes are high. Genetic engineering could allow beef to close a crucial
time gap enjoyed by chicken and pork, which produce meat and 'genetic
efficiency' in a fraction of the time.
This has set up beef producing nations like dominoes. Once one falls
to GM the rest could follow.
But commercial sensitivity prevails.
Australia's sugar export marketing chief David Rutledge this week said
it would be irresponsible for Australia to produce GM sugarcane in the face
of strong consumer reaction against GM food. There was no immediate
prospect of it being grown, he said.
Australia's national wheat exporter AWB Ltd has the same view. GM
wheat would not be grown in Australia for at least three to four years,
only partly because of difficulties with engineering the grain, a
spokeswoman said.
"Our customers have driven us over the last 60 years. If they don't
want it, we're not going to plant it," she said.
No GM barley is produced commercially in Australia although some
research plots are on trial under the umbrella of the government-appointed
Genetic Manipulation Advisory Committee.
"Growers ... understand that they can only produce what the customers,
ultimately the consumers, will want," one barley industry official said.
Canola is the main crop where Australia, now a major world producer
after rapid gains in recent years, sees a clear competitive advantage in
remaining GM-free for now.
With up to 65 percent of the Canadian crop of 8.3 million tonnes
genetically engineered -- and shunned by Europe -- Australia's 2.2 million
tonnes production has an unexpected edge.
"There's certainly a market now for GM-free canola in Japan and in
Europe. That market may last one year, two years, 15 years, 20 years ... At
this stage we just can't say," said Glenn Dalton, grains director of the
NSW Farmers Association.
But Dalton points to the very fine line Australia walks.
AUSTRALIA HEDGES BETS
Most of Australia's farm hierarchy believes the country should develop
and test GM products and that it would be a mistake to have a moratorium on
genetic engineering, he said.
"Our export markets could be decimated overnight if America finished
up with a product that we didn't have access to."
There was still a good case for Australia hanging back from GM
production, especially on plans to produce GM canola in 2001.
"We see nothing wrong with that provided it's going hand-in-hand with
scientific development, controlling and testing," Dalton said. Private
traders agree.
As part of Australia's bet each way, it is as quietly as possible
carrying out scientific trials into a wide range of genetically engineered
crops and products across the country.
Potatoes, canola, poppies, tomatoes, clover, field peas, carnations,
cotton, wheat, barley, tobacco, baker's yeast, fowlpox virus, Indian
mustard, apples, sugarcane and pineapples are all involved. Trials have
also involved pigs and cattle.
Cotton is the exception as Australia's only major GM crop, with about
30 percent of annual output produced from transgenic seed, but is mostly
used as lint in textile manufacture.
Gordon Cherry, Australian Cotton Shippers Association chairman, said
growers were not shrinking from GM cotton, "quite the reverse," because it
reduced use of pest-control chemicals.
Apart from Canada's canola, other major world GM crops are cotton in
the United States, China and Australia, and corn and soy in the U.S. --
both only minor crops in Australia.
Australian and New Zealand health ministers meet in Canberra on
October 22 to consider proposals on labelling for GM foods. Reports say
Australia will most likely have hardline requirements for products with
even minute traces of GM ingredients.
"Million-dollar question," an Australia New Zealand Food Authority
spokeswoman said when asked if the ministers would decide or delay.
(A$1 - US$0.65)

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics | Espa�ol | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff � Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 � Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice:The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.