Search OCA
Get Local!
New Codex Rules Will Require Slightly More US Regulation of GE Foods

New Codex Rules Will Require Slightly More US Regulation of GE Foods
GM draft may be tightened

July 02, 2001 03:01 PM
Geneva, Switzerland

Draft international safety guidelines for genetically modified foods, due to
be approved this week, will require a radical tightening of US safety
assessment procedures if genetically modified crops from the US are to have
open access to the main export markets.

The draft guidelines, which set out basic principles governing risk and
safety assessments for genetically modified (GM) foods, are expected to be
adopted at this week's meeting in Geneva of the Codex Alimentarius
Commission (Codex), the 165-member world body that sets international food
safety standards.

Norms set by Codex, which is run jointly by the World Health Organisation
(WHO) and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), are
used as benchmarks in World Trade Organisation disputes to help determine
whether a country's safety standards represent a disguised barrier to trade.

Failure by the US to adopt Codex standards would make it hard for Washington
to challenge action by other WTO members to bar or restrict US exports of GM
crops. Conversely, the use of Codex standards would help the US attack trade
curbs that lack a scientific justification as well as reassuring consumers
that GM foods are safe.

The absence of international norms, coupled with the political sensitivity
of the food safety issue in Europe, have been key factors inhibiting
Washington from issuing a WTO challenge to the European Union's 1999
moratorium on approval of GM crops.

The Codex guidelines would require the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
to modify its policy in two main ways. First, they specify that all GM foods
should be subject to a safety assessment before they are launched on the
market, as they are in the EU.

The FDA operates a system of voluntary pre-market notifications but, in
response to consumer concerns, it proposed new regulations in February to
make pre-market notification mandatory.

Second, the guidelines state that the use of the principle of "substantial
equivalence" - looking at whether genetically modified foods are broadly the
same as their non-GM equivalents - does not amount to a safety assessment
"in itself", and must be supplemented by specific tests. The FDA currently
uses the "substantial equivalence" principle to decide whether extra tests
are needed.

Jorgen Schlundt, head of WHO's food safety programme, says it is not enough
to look at whether the genetic structure is similar. To ensure there are no
unintended side-effects "you need to see if the introduced gene has switched
on some existing genes or switched others off", he said. While there is no
evidence that GM foods are unsafe it is important to minimise the risk of
"unexpected outcomes".

In April the WHO and FAO published recommendations on reducing the risk of
allergic reactions to GM ingredients - the main perceived health risk - by
trying to ensure known allergens are not transplanted into new foods. These
recommendations are expected to find their way into Codex standards by 2003.

The GM corn StarLink, developed by Aventis CropScience, which was approved
only for animal feed but found its way into some food products consumed by
humans, has been linked to several complaints alleging allergic reactions,
some of them life-threatening.

WHO officials said they were optimistic that the draft guidelines would be
adopted this week.

But they warned that subsequent discussions over such issues as labelling of
GM foods and traceability of GM ingredients could prove much more
controversial.

In February the European Parliament approved tough new legislation requiring
labelling of GM foods and monitoring of GM ingredients through the food
chain, neither of which is deemed necessary by the US.
www.codexalimentarius.net

Copyright © 2001 Financial Times

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Forum | Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About Us | Contact Us | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.
Please Support Our Sponsors!

Organic Valley

Organic
Valley

Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps

Dr. Bronner's
Magic Soaps

Botani Organic

Botani
Organic

Aloha Bay

Aloha Bay

Eden Organics

Eden Foods

Frey Vineyards

Frey
Vineyards

Intelligent Nutrients

Intelligent
Nutrients