FDA Ignores Its Own Poll on Consumers Demanding
Mandatory Labeling of GE Foods

Consumers Want Engineered Food Labeled
Shoppers Express 'Outrage' That Product Choices Aren't Clear, FDA Reports
Washington Post

By Marc Kaufman
02/13/01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumers want mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods and feel
"outrage" when they learn how many supermarket products already are produced
through biotechnology, according to a Food and Drug Administration report.

The internal report, which was commissioned by the agency to gauge sentiment
about its proposals for voluntary labeling, said that consumers are
concerned about possible long-term environmental and health effects of
genetically modifed foods.

"Virtually all participants said that bioengineered foods should be labeled
as such so that they could tell whether a given food was a product of the
new technology," said the report, which is based on focus groups conducted
last year. "They thought it would allow them to make more informed decisions
about whether or not to buy a product."

The labeling of products made through bioengineering has become a
contentious issue, with activists arguing that consumers need and deserve
the information. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich
(D-Ohio) have introduced bills to make labeling mandatory, a step already
taken by the European Union and some Asian nations. The biotechnology
industry has opposed mandatory labeling in the United States, saying that it
would unfairly stigmatize products already determined to be safe.

Joseph A. Levitt, director of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, said the focus group report showed that food biotechnology is a
hot-button issue for many consumers, and that they want more information
about it. But he said the FDA did not consider mandatory labeling to be
scientifically necessary or legally possible. The agency concluded in 1992
that genetically engineered foods are substantially equivalent to
conventional products.

"Companies are going to be pushed by customers to put labeling on their
products," Levitt said. "Our job here is to determine what information would
be educational without being misleading."

The FDA conducted its 12 focus groups in four different cities in the
spring. The report, which had not been made public previously, was released
by Richard Caplan of U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a consumer
watchdog group.

Caplan criticized the FDA for seeking out public opinion about food
biotechnology, but being unwilling to act on the results. He said the report
"severely undercuts the FDA public position on labeling of [engineered]
foods.

"There is overwhelming public support in favor of mandatory labeling, and
the agency knows that," he said. "Whether the concerns are environmental or
health-related, ethical or religious, people want to know when biotechnology
is being used in their food."

The Grocery Manufacturers of America, which represents many food producers,
said that its research similarly showed that people will say that they want
more information about biotechnology on food labels. But spokesman Gene
Grabowski said that follow-up research found that customers want more
information about many subjects, and had no particularly great interest in
biotechnology.

"You ask people if they want to know whether a tomato has been hand-picked
or machine-picked, and they'll tell you they do," he said. "We see biotech
food labeling in the same way." He said that after researchers spent 60 to
90 seconds explaining to people that the FDA did not consider genetically
engineered foods to be different from conventional foods, the number who
wanted mandatory labeling declined substantially.

In the focus group report, consumers voiced great surprise and concern over
the way that bioengineered foods have been introduced, and how widely they
are now used.

"The typical reaction of participants was not one of great concern about the
immediate health and safety effects of unknowingly eating bioengineered
foods, but rather outrage that such a change in the food supply could happen
without them knowing about it," the report said.