SUPPORT OUR
SPONSORS
Organic valley

Organic Valley

Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps

Dr. Bronner's
Magic Soaps

Botani Logo

Botani Organic

Aloha Bay Logo

Aloha Bay

Eden Organics

Eden Foods

Ode Logo

Ode Magazine

Eden Organics

Mountain
Rose Herbs

Green Guide Logo

The Green Guide

Search OCA:
State News & Activities:
OCA News Sections:
Canada deregulates poultry inspection
SUPPORT OUR
SPONSORS
Organic valley

Organic Valley

Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps

Dr. Bronner's
Magic Soaps

Botani Logo

Botani Organic

Aloha Bay Logo

Aloha Bay

Eden Organics

Eden Foods

Ode Logo

Ode Magazine

Eden Organics

Mountain
Rose Herbs

Green Guide Logo

The Green Guide

Search OCA:
State News & Activities:
OCA News Sections:

back to Organic Consumers Assn. Stop Food Irradiation page

Canada deregulates poultry inspection

Now it can be done by company inspectors

OCA editor's note: This is a press release so it speaks favorably of this change, but the meaning is clear: Canadian poultry producers now have the option to use government inspectors only as "supervisors" of employees of the poultry slaughterhouses. Expect more disease and contamination, and much greater pressure for irradiation. Why? Because if they INCREASE the amount of bacteria (which is very likely) and ALSO add a requirement for DECREASED bacteria, they are going to want to irradiate to meet their own standard. Stay tuned.

May 30, 2001

The Meat Inspection Regulations have been amended to strengthen Canada's poultry and meat inspection programs in federally registered establishments. The amendment allows for the implementation of the Modernized Poultry Inspection Program (MPIP) and helps maintain Canada's excellent domestic and international reputation for a safe and high-quality food supply.

A copy of the amendment can be obtained from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) Web site at www.inspection.gc.ca or the Canada Gazette Web site at http://www.canada.gc.ca/gazette/gazette_e.html

Effects on Industry The amendment gives federally registered poultry slaughter establishments the option of implementing a science-based inspection system known as the Modernized Poultry Inspection Program (MPIP), where trained industry employees conduct all post-mortem carcass-by-carcass examinations under continuous monitoring and assessment by government inspectors. Abnormal carcasses are still referred to a CFIA veterinarian for appropriate disposition.

Establishments choosing not to adopt MPIP must continue to implement either traditional inspection, where government inspectors perform all post-mortem defect detection activities, or the Canadian Poultry Inspection Program (CPIP), where government inspectors and industry employees share post-mortem defect detection responsibilities. Under CPIP or MPIP operations, plant quality control employees are required to receive training so they have the necessary skills and knowledge to properly perform their duties.

Establishments choosing to implement either traditional, CPIP or MPIP methodologies are required to meet all regulations applying to traditional, CPIP or MPIP operations. CFIA inspection staff will have different roles depending on which methodology is applied but, in all cases, retain full authority to enforce the provisions of the Meat Inspection Regulations.

The amendment also requires that flock information sheets be submitted for all poultry lots presented for slaughter - regardless of the inspection methodology employed. The amendment allows ante-mortem examination of poultry by trained industry employees under certain conditions and under the supervision of an official veterinarian.

It also addresses the conditions under which the license to operate a registered establishment is issued, renewed, suspended or revoked. And, it attaches conditions to licenses where necessary to ensure compliance with the Meat Inspection Act and Regulations, and food safety requirements.

Enhancing Food Safety Canada has one of the safest poultry inspection systems in the world. Plants operating under traditional inspection and CPIP inspection systems consistently produce high quality products that are recognized internationally. However, the Government of Canada recognizes that we must continuously improve Canada¹s inspection methods if we are to effectively meet emerging food safety challenges.

Under MPIP, inspection staff have more time to ensure that the hazards in live poultry are better controlled at farm level as well as by establishment operators when receiving loads of live poultry.

Furthermore, MPIP is the first Canadian poultry slaughtering inspection system which requires chilled carcasses to meet specified microbiological requirements for Salmonella.

Consultation with Stakeholders The CFIA worked closely with stakeholders in developing this regulatory amendment. Health Canada, the Consumers¹ Association of Canada, and Canada's major national industry associations, including the Chicken Farmers of Canada, the Canadian Turkey Marketing Agency, the Canadian Poultry and Egg Processors Council, and the Further Poultry Processors Association of Canada were actively consulted.

For more information on the amendment please contact:
Dr. Claude Boissoneault
CFIA, Ottawa
(613) 225-2342, ext. 4676

Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics | Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice:The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.