SUPPORT OUR
SPONSORS
Organic valley

Organic Valley

Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps

Dr. Bronner's
Magic Soaps

Botani Logo

Botani Organic

Aloha Bay Logo

Aloha Bay

Eden Organics

Eden Foods

Ode Logo

Ode Magazine

Eden Organics

Mountain
Rose Herbs

Green Guide Logo

The Green Guide

Search OCA:
State News & Activities:
OCA News Sections:
We have the dead bodies and still, nothing has been done

August 13, 2002

We have the dead bodies and still, nothing has been done

By KATHLEEN S. KELLEY

"I said ten years ago something would finally be done when we had dead bodies. Well we've had the dead bodies and still, nothing has been done." These words came from Bill Lehman, a USDA meat inspector in Sweet Grass, Montana. I interviewed him for a series of articles I was writing back in 1996.

Some may remember Lehman as a courageous whistle blower who risked his career to reveal, over the objections of his superiors at USDA, that deadly e-coli tainted meat used by the Jack In the Box hamburger chain had indeed been imported. Several children died. Lehman testified twice at congressional hearings in 1991, again in 1993 and blew the whistle on the lack of inspection at the Canadian border in 1996. He thought the whistle-blower act would protect him.

It didn't.

Mark Manis, the then head of USDA Meat Import Inspection Division called Lehman "a loose cannon" and said he was a rogue who "needed to be under close supervision." By December of 1996 Lehman was ordered to report to a new assignment in Oklahoma inspecting chickens. He told me, "I don't know anything about chickens." He quit USDA. He didn't want anybody's illness or death on his hands because he didn't know what he was doing.

"God's watching," he explained.

Lehman died a few weeks later in 1997 of a massive heart attack.

I was inspecting tomatoes in my garden a couple weeks ago when columnist Diane Carman from the Denver Post called and asked, "what do you think of the 19 million pounds of e-coli tainted hamburger recalled by USDA from ConAgra?"

So I told her. Some of it was harsh. But mostly, I criticized an increasingly concentrated industry where the scale of slaughter is so large the contamination from one carcass can be mixed with 24,000 carcasses and spread from coast to coast in a matter of days. Even more problematic, it can occur in all of agriculture where numerous food-borne illness can be spread instantaneously through our high speed mass-processing, mass-distribution system.

What I didn't say, but should have is that I am furious with some of our key leaders in our agricultural industry who pretend every problem facing us can be solved by "turning up the heat." But not against the real problem. They just increase the heat against their critics.

From the National Cattlemens Beef Association, there are sizzling e-mails calling those of us who raise these issues an assortment of derogatory names like rogue, PETA lovers, and anti-beef demigods. There is response letter-to-the-editor drafted in their public relations office for the signature of "a grass-roots cattle producer" so to an unwary public, it looks like the meat packers are supported by the cattlemen themselves even in their massive damage to the beef economy. The drafters as they circulated the letter wrote, "Kathleen ought to duck. It's going to hurt. . . ." referring to the planned mud-slinging campaign against those of us who dared express our concerns about the unnecessary harm this does to everyone.

Bring it on !!!

As cattle producers who love this industry, care for our communities and our friends, it is imperative we not let another year pass with more tragic e-coli victims. We must not be hampered in our exercise of free speech by our detractors. It's their behavior that is unconscionable. Turning up the heat to mask the problem is no solution.

Our detractors, primarily the NCBA, instead of misleading consumers about conditions in the beef industry, should join us in efforts to see that existing mandates for clean carcass standards are effectively enforced. Instead of blindly spewing conspiracy propaganda in an effort to discredit us, they should help us fight for truly competitive markets through strong enforcement of antitrust laws so consumers have choices. Finally, in a gesture to consumers that the truth matters, they should quit opposing strong country of origin labeling laws and regulations on meat, and support rules that label beef with substantive, accurate information instead of wasting time labeling their critics.

For all of us who enjoy beef and the lifestyle it celebrates, we must reinvent government meat inspection, shift it from USDA and put it in an agency where those it regulates, can't control it. In addition we must value and recreate competitive, diverse markets. In today's merged markets, consumers and producers are out of choices and packers can do what they please with impunity.

They just proved it.

I just wish we had Bill Lehman watching.

Kathleen Kelley is a fourth generation Colorado rancher and was Vice Chair of the National Commission on Small Farms. She was a Harvard Fellow in 1986 and taught a study group on the American Farm Crisis.

From:
The AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER
August 9, 2002 #181
Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective
EDITOR\PUBLISHER: A.V. Krebs
ADDRESS: PO. Box 2201, Everett, Washington 98203-0201
E-MAIL: avkrebs@earthlink.net
WEB SITE: http://www.ea1.com/CARP/
TO RECEIVE: Name and e-mail address
CONTRIBUTION$ WELCOME !!!

CORPORATE AGRIBUSINESS RESEARCH PROJECT WEB SITE INITIATES RENEWED SUPPORT EFFORT

It is rather curious that as more and more people from literally around the world request to regularly receive THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER, lavish in their much appreciated praise for the work it seeks to do, fewer and fewer people seem willing to financially contribute to its support.
Those handful of regular contributors who have earned the editor's undying gratitude over the past four years and the few other occasional welcome individual supporters stand in marked contrast to those many who obviously have believed during that time that their aid could be better applied elsewhere, particularly when it comes farm and rural organizations. Such neglect, however, when it comes to rural concerns is recognized from this desk as not uncommon in our modern affluent and well fed society.
Since the AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER first appeared some 180 issues ago it has been the publisher's intent to make the work of the Corporate Agribusiness Research Project (CARP) and the monitoring of corporate agribusiness from a public interest perspective available to the widest possible audience, seeing that those few and available publications that still concern themselves with corporate agribusiness are so prohibitively expensive, to say nothing of their pro-corporate bias.
But, because there is a more a need today than ever before to make corporate agribusiness more accountable to the common good, it is the wish and hope of THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER to continue to play a major role in that effort. Your contributions will go far in helping to perpetuate that hope. Such contributions may be sent to the editor at the above address.

As part of a major effort to keep those committed to bringing economic and political democracy to rural America informed, educated and updated the Corporate Agribusiness Research Project is happy to point out that its web site has been updated and streamlined. http://www.ea1.com/CARP/

Among the site's many features are:
> A complete index of THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER'S first 162 issues with a
"Search" engine to provide easy access to the subject matter of each edition.
> Å new edition of THE AGBIZ TILLER, the progeny of the one-time printed
newsletter, featuring the essay "The Merchants of Greed," an in-depth essay dealing with
today's corporate agribusiness. Likewise the "Search" engine is also available for past
editions of THE AGBIZ TILLER.
> In "Between the Furrows," besides a modern "Search" engine, there is a wide range
of pages designed to inform and educate readers on the inner workings of corporate
agribusiness. They include:
* CARP's "Mission Statement," "Overview" and THE AGRIBUSINESS
EXAMINER'S Editor\Publisher's "Resume."
* "Fact Miners," an effort to assist the reader in the necessary art of researching
corporations
* "Quotable Quotes" pertaining to agribusiness and corporate power
* "Links," a page which allows the reader to survey various useful public interest,
government and corporate web sites;
* "Feedback" an opportunity for reader input:
* The Corporate Reapers: The Book of Agribusiness, a page where readers can order
directly the editor's 1992 published book from Essential Books.

The CARP web site was designed and produced by ElectricArrow of Seattle,
Washington. http://www.electricarrow.com

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics | Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice:The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.