Search OCA
Get Local!

 

Irradiated Beef Faces Slow Rollout to Consumers

Monday April 3, 2000
By Carey Gillam

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (Reuters) - Fearful of a negative public backlash, food
companies and retailers are moving slowly to introduce irradiated ground beef products to store shelves, despite government approval granted in February, industry executives said on Monday.

While public opinion polls show that consumers are eager for safer meat products, there are a host of fears to overcome when it comes to the benefits of irradiation techniques, a group of industry players told Reuters at the 2000 Meat Marketing Conference held in Kansas City.

``There is a highly charged atmosphere around this issue,'' said Pete Ellis, chief executive of Food Technology Service Inc., a Florida-based irradiation company for the food market. ''Everybody will tell you they are interested in doing this, but they don't want to be first, they want to be a fast second.''

Irradiation techniques, which beam varying levels of radiation through food to kill illness-causing bacteria, can vastly reduce the reduce the number of people who suffer sickness or even death after eating meat tainted with E.coli, listeria and salmonella, proponents say.

About 5,000 people die annually from eating contaminated foods, so irradiation should be readily embraced, they say.

Instead, the proponents say, large food companies and government health officials are dragging their feet in rolling out marketing and consumer education programs necessary to advance irradiated meat into the marketplace. Fear of inciting public opposition such as has been seen with protests against genetically modified food products are a factor.

``It's frustrating,'' said Ellis. ``Everybody needs to be proactive, but it's not happening.''

One notable exception is Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:WMT - news), which plans to test-market irradiated ground beef in its stores to determine consumer demand and the premium they would pay.

Wal-Mart executives announced the move in late February, and most retailers are content to let Wal-Mart lead the way, said Clemens Markets meat merchandising manager Al Kober. Clemens operates a chain of Pennsylvania retail outlets.

``We're waiting to see the response they (Wal-Mart) get from consumers,'' Kober said.

On the processing front, Colorado Boxed Beef Co. developed an assortment of introductory irradiated beef products that it plans to roll out in limited areas in Florida this month.

In addition to questions about consumer willingness to absorb added costs -- about 3 to 8 cents per pound with irradiation, according to industry estimates -- those marketing meat to consumers must overcome vague fears that radiation may be harmful when the meat is eaten, said the industry leaders.

Required labeling declaring the meat to have undergone radiation is not considered helpful in dispelling consumer fears, and needs active promotion before consumers will see the new label as a food safety sign, the industry players said.

Still, with an increasing consumer outcry for safer food products, irradiated beef will likely make up at least 15 percent of the ground beef market within three years, the industry group projected.

``The (irradiation) process takes care of all major pathogens responsible for food safety problems,'' said Joseph Borsa, product manager for Canada-based MDS Nordion, an international radiation technology company with a majority stake in Food Technology Service. ``This is a premium product.''

copyright 2000 Reuters

back
 

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Forum | Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About Us | Contact Us | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.