Biotech Wheat - Friend or Foe?

Wheat Farmers See Biotech As Friend And Foe
Reuters
Apr 29 2001 1:43PM

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (Reuters) - North Dakota farmer Lowell Berntson
considers himself a fan of biotechnology.

With thousands of acres of rich black Dakota dirt planted in soybeans
and canola crops that are genetically modified to fight weed problems,
Berntson knows first-hand how beneficial biotech can be. But ask
Berntson whether or not he'll welcome the world's first biotech wheat,
also altered to reduce weed problems and due to be launched as
early as 2003, and he sees trouble ahead.

"Our customers don't want it. That is clear," he said from the
southeast North Dakota farm where he grows traditional dark northern
spring wheat alongside genetically modified (GM) crops. "We darn well
better not send them any."

Berntson is one of thousands of wheat producers in the United States
who have been thrust deep into the heart of an ongoing global debate
over genetically modified foods. With food safety activists and
environmentalists on one side and biotech research companies on the
other, farmers are caught in the middle.

And nowhere are they feeling more tightly entwined than in North
Dakota, the U.S.'s largest producer of spring wheat and a key launch
site for Monsanto Co.'s plans to roll out a GM spring wheat seed
sometime between 2003-2005. The "Roundup Ready" wheat will resist
Monsanto's top-selling herbicide, helping farmers more easily kill
weeds without harming their crops.

Corn, soybeans and other genetically modified crops have been out in
the marketplace for the last several years. Researchers once believed
GM wheat would join the list with little fanfare.

But food safety concerns have mounted around the world recently, and
questions continue about whether biotech foods trigger allergic
reactions or are otherwise unsafe to eat. Evidence in recent months
has shown that it is virtually impossible to keep biotech crops
separate from traditional crops. As such, wheat, a main ingredient in
bread, cereals, and other basic human foods, is proving to be a
hot-button issue.

Even if only a small amount of GM wheat is sown in U.S. spring wheat
territory, many fear the entire U.S. spring wheat supply of more than
500 million bushels will be subject to boycott by top buyers of U.S.
spring wheat such as Japan and Europe. Those countries have insisted
they won't purchase genetically modified wheat and will have little
tolerance for any contamination of traditional wheat by a biotech
variety.

The threat is a weighty one. Last year, total exports of U.S. spring
wheat were worth more than $900 million, with more than a third of
that from sales to Japan and Europe, according to industry statistics.
"We could create a train wreck in our own markets," said North Dakota
Wheat Commission administrator Neal Fisher. "The concerns are
mounting, rather than diminishing. There are producers out there,
certainly, who are clamoring for the technology. But we can't afford
to 40 percent of our markets."

Fears of lost export business are so strong that North Dakota
legislators tried this spring to enact a moratorium on a GM wheat
release in their state. But intensive lobbying against the bill by
Monsanto, including threats to pull research investment dollars out
of the state, effectively quashed the efforts, moratorium proponents
said.

Monsanto representative Michael Doane outraged some in a legislative
hearing on the moratorium proposal when he told lawmakers that "we're
investing heavily in this technology... if this legislation passes I
simply cannot ask (Monsanto) to continue to fund and develop the
research that is necessary to develop biotech traits in wheat."
The threat was effective, said Democratic state legislator Ken
Kroeplin, who backed the moratorium effort.

"They were aggressive, they got everything they wanted," he said.
"We're all struggling with this," said Cole Gustafson, director of
North Dakota State University's agricultural experiment station where
Monsanto and university scientists have collaborated in wheat
breeding research.

"North Dakota producers are way of this technology, but they want to
make sure research progresses," he said. He would not disclose how
much Monsanto has invested in university research.

The answer for now, many say, is to simply slow down and wait for
market acceptance to grow to embrace GM wheat and other crops.
Indeed, wheat leaders not just in North Dakota, but throughout the
U.S., say they want Monsanto to back off its timetable, which
includes filing applications for U.S. regulatory approval later this
year.

"It needs to be longer than 2005 before they introduce," said the
wheat commission's Fisher. "We're for whatever it takes to slow the
process up."

Monsanto has so far refused to budge from its 2003-2005 release
target. But it has formed a wheat industry advisory committee to help
guide it on key issues and says it is working hard to warm foreign
buyers to the new wheat.

Meanwhile, North Dakota spring wheat farmers wait and worry.
"The biotech thing is the most exciting thing happening by far in
agriculture right now," said farmer Berntson. "But it is a big
concern too. I'm really torn."
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
"Today capital takes rank over compassion, and property is of greater
importance than people. Our Earth and it's animals are being
murdered. One must assume that today legality no longer coincides
with morality. So in order to live morally you must be living
outside the law. I write you this as a captive of the law, but ask
this of yourselves...Do I want to be held captive any longer? Will I
sit by and watch the rich eat the poor, the people eat the animals,
society devour our hope, and watch as our earth die around us?
LET FREEDOM RING! SUPPORT DIRECT ACTION!"
-Former Political Prisoner Andy Stepanian, writing from jail on
Martin Luther King Day

"Rice and beans are the food of the people!"- Student protesters in
Brazil at a McDonalds during the World Economic Forum, as they,
"burst into the McDonald's in the food court of a local shopping
center, spraying red paint on tables and chairs and overturning trash
cans."
-------------
The Activism Center at Wetlands Preserve, 161 Hudson Street, NY, NY
10013 Phone: (212) 966-4831 Email: adam@wetlands-preserve.org Fax:
(212) 925-8715
Call or email us for information on our year-round internship program
(Academic credit can be arranged with many schools).
Affiliated with Rainforest Relief, the Global Sweatshop Coalition,
and the No Spray Coalition One Struggle, One Fight....For the Earth
and Human and Animal Rights!!!