Organic Consumers Association
OCA
Homepage

Mexico Tries To Silence Small Farmers Opposition to NAFTA


Mexican industrialists want strong-arm approach to farm protests

(Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2003 -- CropChoice news) -- Diego Cevallos, Inter
Press Service: MEXICO CITY - Industrialists in Mexico urged the
government Monday to take a heavy-handed approach to protests by small
farmers opposed to the lifting of tariffs in trade in agriculture with
the United States and Canada, who have threatened new demonstrations and
even a nationwide strike.

The strike may be called in February, if the government fails to accept
the demands set forth by the country's peasant farmers, said Francisco
Hernández, the president of the National Workers' Union, a powerful
central trade union with ties to the political left, that claims to
represent more than two million workers in this country of 100 million.

Mexico's small farmers are opposed to the second of three phases of
liberalization of trade in agriculture as outlined by the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

When the latest measures went into effect on Jan 1, a new wave of
protest marches, roadblocks and demonstrations outside government
buildings was triggered, after a week-long truce.

Business leader Javier Prieto, the head of the Confederation of
Industrial Chambers, asked the government Monday to get tough with the
peasant activists and their allies.

The country's industrialists defend the strict application of NAFTA,
which provides them with access to imported raw materials at lower
prices than those offered by local suppliers, while facilitating exports
of manufactured goods.

After NAFTA went into effect, Mexico's exports expanded from 60.8
billion dollars in 1994 to 158.4 billion in 2001. In the same period,
imports grew from 79.3 to 168.3 billion dollars.

''We must seek reconciliation, but only to a reasonable point,'' said
Prieto, who accused the peasant farmers of taking action with the coming
legislative elections, scheduled for July, in mind.

''When elections are on the horizon, social mobilizations heat up,
because there is less of a chance of a harsh crackdown, and the
opposition seeks ammunition to win votes,'' said Raúl Trejo, a
researcher with the Center of Economic Research and Teaching.

The protests have been spearheaded by members of the country's leading
peasant farmer organizations, linked to the leftist opposition parties
and to the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which governed the
country from 1929 to 2000.

The farmers' associations have threatened to break off their talks with
the administration of President Vicente Fox (news - web sites),
complaining that the government is not willing to renegotiate NAFTA.

The trade unions have never held a national strike in Mexico's modern
history, largely because most of them formed part of the corporatist
structure of the once all-powerful PRI, which was defeated by Fox in
2000.

Mexico's farmers complain that ''the countryside can't take anymore,''
and blame all of their woes on the lifting of import duties on farm
goods under NAFTA, the free trade bloc created by Canada, Mexico and the
United States in 1994.

In one of their most high-profile protests, farmers rode horses into
parliament late last year.

The farmers will paralyze the country and close the borders if the
government does not agree to renegotiate the terms of NAFTA by late
January, said the rural activists.

According to official figures, nearly all of Mexico's rural inhabitants
are living below the poverty line.

In the past few decades, Canada and the United States have continued to
subsidize their farmers at the same time that they opened their borders,
while Mexico whittled away at its policies of support for the
countryside.

Public spending in support of the rural sector shrank 95.5 percent
between 1982 and 2001, said researcher José Luis Calva with the National
Autonomous University of Mexico.

In 1982, when the country began to open up its markets, annual food
imports totaled 7.8 billion dollars a year, compared to more than 11
billion dollars in 2001, Calva pointed out.

Analysts and politicians are discussing whether the crisis in the
countryside is due more to the liberalization of trade or to a mistaken
strategy of agricultural development applied by PRI governments over the
past 20 years.

Fox insists that NAFTA is beneficial to Mexico and will not be
renegotiated. But he offered to hold talks with the farmers in order to
seek solutions to their problems, and said the government would adopt
all of the necessary measures and safeguards to defend the rural sector.

The current wave of protests is led by the National Union of Autonomous
Regional Peasant Organizations, which links 30 groups of rural producers
with ties to leftist parties, and by the PRI- affiliated National
Peasant Confederation.

The mobilizations began late last year, shortly before the start of the
latest phase of agricultural liberalization, which has entailed the
lifting of tariffs on 21 farm products among the members of NAFTA,
including potatoes, wheat, apples, onions, coffee, chicken and veal.

The first stage of the opening of trade in agriculture accompanied the
implementation of the free trade deal in 1994, and the third phase is
scheduled to begin in 2008.

In 1993, when NAFTA was negotiated, then-president Carlos Salinas
(1988-1994) agreed to the opening of the Mexican market to farm imports
with the support of the country's most powerful associations of small
farmers -- all of which are protesting the effects of the free trade
agreement today.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics | Espaņol | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice:The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.