Organic Bytes #135: 5/22/2008
IN THIS ISSUE
- Alert: Mainstream Media Attempts to Bury Homeopathy
- Alert: Stop Bush's Biotech Bullying!
- Survey: CBS, New York Times Poll Consumers About GE Foods
- Quote: Biotech Corporations Prepare to Profit off Climate Crisis With New 'Climate-Ready' GE-Plants
- Small Farms Are More Productive and Profitable
- Consumer Groups Pressure USDA to Launch Investigation of Horizon "Organic" Factory Farms
- NPR Takes a Look at the Future of Laboratory-Grown Meat
- Organic Bytes Readers Talk Back: Are There Any Recycled Home Water Filtration Systems?
- Organic Bytes Readers Talk Back: Are Any Plastics Safe for Use With Food?
- Web Forum: Whole Foods Market... Again
- State News & Alerts: CA, MD, NE, OR, PA, TX, WA
Health, Justice and Sustainability News Tidbits with an Edge!
Written and edited by Craig Minowa and Ronnie Cummins
Mainstream Media Attempts
to Bury Homeopathy
Consumer Reports journalist Doug Podolsky took a stab at homeopathy in the recent issue of Consumer Reports. Despite hundreds of years of successful use for a variety of ailments, homeopathy is quackery, according to Podolsky who writes, "Check whether over-the-counter products are labeled homeopathic. If they are, we think you should put them back on the shelf."
Podolsky's Consumer Reports piece references a 2005 study indicating homeopathy is ineffective, but he fails to mention the study has since been debunked. Unfortunately, due to the prestige of Consumer Reports, the article has already gone viral, as marketing firms and pharmaceutical companies spread it far and wide in an attempt to snuff competition from the natural health world.
Learn more and take action: www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_12475.cfm
Stop Bush's Biotech Bullying!
According to the Chicago Tribune, the White House is attempting to force famine stricken countries, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa, to plant genetically engineered (GE) crops, as part of a $770 million aid package.
Untested and largely unregulated GE crops are controversial, not only in Europe and other industrialized countries, but in the developing world as well. At least 40 countries around the world have restricted GE farming and ingredients in foods by requiring mandatory labeling, while a number of nations and regions have banned genetically modified organisms in agriculture altogether.
Beyond health and environmental concerns, GE crops have not proven to significantly increase yields, but rather force farmers to stop saving their seeds and instead buy toxic chemicals and highly priced patented seeds from biotech companies such as Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, Dupont, and BASF.
Please take action today
and urge your members of Congress to reject the Bush Administration's force-feeding
of biotech crops to impoverished nations:
CBS News, New York Times Poll Consumers About GE Foods
- 53%: Percentage of polled Americans who say they won't buy food that has ingredients from genetically engineered (GE) plants.
- 65%: Actual percentage of products on grocery store shelves that contain unlabeled GE ingredients (usually soy or corn derived).
- 90%: Portion of U.S. grown soybeans that are genetically engineered.
- 99%: Estimated likelihood that the U.S. sugar supply will start to be sourced from genetically engineered plants this year.
Take action: www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_7031.cfm
Biotech Corporations Prepare to Profit off Climate Crisis With New 'Climate-Ready' GE-Plants
"In the face of climate chaos and a deepening world food crisis, the Gene Giants are gearing up for a PR offensive to re-brand themselves as climate saviors. The companies hope to convince governments and reluctant consumers that genetic engineering is the essential adaptation strategy to insure agricultural productivity. Globally, the top 10 seed corporations already control 57% of commercial seed sales. This is a bid to capture as much of the rest of the market as possible."
Source: Hope Shand, Research Director of ETC Group, speaks of the recent research indicating that the world's largest biotech companies are developing and patenting hundreds of varieties of new "climate ready" genetically engineered crops designed to supposedly endure the worst of global climate change. The ETC Group is mobilizing people around the world to censure these companies for focusing on profitable ways of taking advantage of the climate crisis, rather than looking for solutions to the actual problem.
Small Farms are More Productive and Profitable
- A 1,000 acre U.S. corporate farm growing genetically engineered crops nets an average of $39 an acre.
- In contrast, a four-acre family farm nets, on average, $1,400 per acre.
- Small organic farms are proving to be even more profitable. With oil prices on the rise, growing food without petroleum-based pesticides/fertilizers, and delivering that food to local markets will quickly prove to be the most affordable food available.
Source: New York Times www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_12216.cfm
Consumer Groups Pressure USDA to Launch Investigation of Horizon "Organic" Factory Farms
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) filed a letter with USDA this week supporting a legal complaint that calls for an investigation of the two factory farms that the Horizon organic dairy company manages and sources for a significant portion of their "organic" dairy products.
As discussed in previous issues of Organic Bytes, since 2006, the OCA has called for a boycott of Horizon's (Dean Foods) dairy products, due to the corporation's practice of packing as many as 8,000 cattle onto feedlots, with little or no access to pasture, and then misleadingly labeling these products as "organic".
OCA's ally, The Cornucopia Institute, has filed several legal complaints with the USDA, demanding an investigation of the factory farms, but such requests have, thus far, fallen on deaf ears. Serving as a representative for our 850,000 members, volunteers and subscribers, the OCA is putting heat on the USDA to investigate and sanction the Horizon factory farms.
Help OCA Fight for Health, Justice, and the Environment
Support OCA with your stimulus check. During a recession, non-profits need private donor help more than ever.
NPR Takes a Look at the Future of Laboratory-Grown Meat
For many years, scientists have been capable of culturing cells in laboratories in order to grow skin and tissue for medical purposes. The process is now becoming inexpensive enough to consider growing meat in laboratories for consumer use.
Organizations like PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) are all for it. It's not a biotech process, and it's not cloning, it's just a matter of giving cells the nutrients they need to replicate and create the tissue and muscle that makes up what carnivores call "meat".
But other experts are concerned about the amount of energy consumption required by the process. So is it good or bad? Listen to this National Public Radio special program on synthetically grown meats and decide for yourself: www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_12464.cfm
Talk about it in OCA's web forum (under the "Topic of the Week"): www.organicconsumers.org/forum/
Are There Any Recycled Home Water Filtration Systems?
Reader's Question: A reader writes to us regarding our article calling on readers to pressure Brita to begin recycling their water filters, as they do in Europe: "I do happen to use the Brita filter system. It would be wonderful if the Brita company did do recycled water filters. However, I do not know of any other water filtration, or water filter systems who do have a recycled filter system in place. Are you aware of any? Frankly, I felt I was doing so well with water filter systems as opposed to packaged bottle water, that I did not really think about how the filters could be 'recycled manufactured'."
OCA Response: Yes, as noted in our article, using the Brita water filtration systems is a much better option, environmentally speaking, than buying bottled water. As for companies that offer home water filter recycling, you could check out www.terraflo.com & www.abundantearth.com/store/countertopfilter.html If you have a Brita system already, you can send those used filters to www.takebackthefilter.org
Reader's Question: In the last issue of Organic Bytes, we published a "Users Guide to Plastics" to help consumers understand what those little numbers on the bottom of plastic products mean. Here is what one reader had to say: "My comment was to the list of plastics published in your last bulletin. You say that PET (#1) "poses low risk of leaching breakdown products". But one of the substances of the PET is phthalates, which is a hormone disruptor. It leaches into the liquid and poses a health risk."
OCA Response: Yes, you are correct. As a note, the posted plastics guide is relative. We always recommend consumers look for glass, aluminum or tin as an option over any plastic packaged product. If you need to buy plastic, PET (#1) is one of the safest options over some of the other plastics, but all plastics demonstrate varying levels of leaching, particularly when heated. Avoid hot liquids in plastic containers. Also avoid microwaving plastics or placing them in dishwashers.
Whole Foods Market... Again
In the last issue of Organic Bytes, we invited you to share experiences you've had with Whole Foods Market and/or opinions you have about the good and bad elements of the natural foods chain in comparison to locally owned co-ops and natural products stores.
Unfortunately, our web forum crashed shortly after Organic Bytes was sent out to our list, and many of you wrote to us expressing that you'd like to post your thoughts once the web forum was fixed. Well, it's fixed. So let's give this another shot. If you are new to our forum, it's a place where thousands of like-minded folk are having online discussions about everything from gardening, to natural health, to politics.
Check it out: www.organicconsumers.org/forum/
California: Support Green Jobs in California.
Support Our Supporters
If You Eat Organic, Shouldn't You Sleep Organic?
What is an organic mattress?
A typical “chemical” mattress is made primarily from crude oil and natural-gas derivatives like polyurethane, Styrofoam, polyester, dyes, chemical fire retardants, and many other chemicals that can produce serious health conditions
Organic mattresses are made without these harmful chemicals in the only organic Eco-Factory™ in North America, and have also been independently tested and certified by the GREENGUARD Environmental Institute. Lifekind® mattresses and foundations are simply the safest and most healthful mattresses you can buy. They're all made by hand using pure certified organic cotton, 100% natural rubber, and Naturally Safer™ wool. No fire retardants, no chemical treatments, and no synthetic components.
call us at 800-284-4983 for more information and to receive a free catalog.
Eden Foods is one of the few national organic food producers who goes beyond the USDA Organic Standards. Although Eden Foods is USDA certified, their products do not bear the USDA seal, because they say the USDA standard really represents a "minimum standard" that Eden Foods goes far beyond.