Organic Consumers Association

Canadian Wheat Board Speaks Out Against Roundup Ready Wheat

Toronto Star
February 25, 2003 Tuesday Ontario Edition
The risks of modified wheat

 BY Stewart Wells and Holly Penfound

On Dec. 23, while most Canadians were distracted by holiday revelry,
Monsanto quietly submitted an application to a government agency for
genetically modified wheat.

If all requirements are met, Canada could become the first country to allow
the large-scale production and sale of Monsanto's GM wheat. While the
long-standing concerns of environmentalists and consumers regarding the
health and environmental risks of such crops remain, GM wheat poses a whole
other set of risks that has even the most biotech friendly farmer in a
panic: the potential to virtually kill Canada's wheat export markets.

At around $3 billion annually, wheat is Canada's leading agricultural
product. Canada exports a full 75 per cent of its wheat. The Canadian Wheat
Board estimates that customers for 82 per cent of western red spring wheat,
the main type of wheat grown in Canada, do not want to buy GM wheat.

Monsanto, which has tried to present itself as willing to listen to and
address these concerns, broke that promise and rushed its application
forward at a time when few would be watching.

To make its new wheat, Monsanto inserted foreign genes into the DNA of
western red spring wheat, the wheat used to make flour and bread. The
change makes the wheat able to withstand sprays of Monsanto's powerful
herbicide Roundup. The result is something that looks like wheat, but is
actually a laboratory invention. Consumers the world over have, when given
a choice, rejected GM products, and many companies and countries simply
refuse to buy GM crops. Worse, many buyers of Canadian wheat have said they
will buy no wheat from a country where the GM variety is grown.

That's why the wheat board has joined with groups such as Greenpeace and
the Council of Canadians - two organizations it has clashed with in the
past - to present a united front opposing GM wheat. In a series of town
hall forums across the prairies, beginning in Winnipeg this week, farmers
will get a chance to voice their concerns.

Fear of contamination (through cross-pollination or through accidental
mixing of grains) means that even a small amount of GM wheat grown in
Canada could sabotage large portions of our market. For Canadian farmers,
the result would be devastating. As a spokesperson for Rank Hovis,
Britain's biggest flour mill, has said, "If you do grow genetically
modified wheat, we will not be able to buy any of your wheat - neither the
GM nor the conventional. This has nothing to do with principle, or with
trade barriers. We just cannot sell it."

Canada's wheat has an excellent reputation for high, predictable and
consistent quality. It would be a herculean - many say impossible -
undertaking to segregate GM wheat from traditional varieties. Even Monsanto
has acknowledged that it will be impossible to ensure 100 per cent purity
once GM varieties are introduced.

A University of Saskatchewan study concluded that segregation isn't
feasible, and GM wheat genetics will contaminate non-GM fields and
shipments. All farmers, both those growing GM wheat and those who don't,
will be worse off, to the tune of $45.8 million and more than $32.3 million
respectively, the study found.

The only party that can expect to make money, the study found, is Monsanto,
which would generate about $157 million in net returns. So after much
effort and expense, much of our market will still be lost since most of our
highest paying customers have little interest in buying wheat with even 1
per cent GM contamination. The bottom line is, Monsanto will make the money
while farmers pay the price.

For Monsanto, this application is all about economics. The company has been
hemorrhaging money - a $1.69 billion (U.S.) loss last year compared with
profits of $295 million in the same period a year earlier. The poor
financial performance led to the abrupt departure in December of the
company's chief executive.

Sales of Monsanto's Roundup herbicide are down. The patent has expired,
allowing competitors into the market, and the company's biotech strategy
has so far proven to be a loser. Roundup Ready wheat would boost herbicide
sales at a time when Monsanto is surely desperate to return to profitability..

Underlying the economic concerns is the credibility problem of the approval
process for GM crops. A year ago, the Royal Society of Canada raised
numerous concerns with the system's ability to ensure health and
environmental safety. In addition, the approval process has no mechanism
for considering the societal or economic impacts of GM crops. Farmers have
no meaningful input. Those whose livelihoods are most directly affected are
frozen out of the decision.

GM wheat could be the final blow for many of Canada's farmers, already
struggling with drought and adverse economics. It also puts our reputation
as the world's breadbasket at risk.

But there is a potential silver lining here. Some believe that at least one
of the big exporting countries will refrain from allowing GM wheat in order
to increase market share. This has already happened with canola, with
Australia refusing to grow it, and soybeans, with Brazil refusing to grow it..

Instead of being the first country in the world to commercialize GM wheat,
Canada could remain free of the controversial crop, with attendant market
advantages. Prime Minister Jean Chretien could position Canada for this
role by nipping GM wheat in the bud - protecting human health and the
environment, and raising grain prices in the bargain.

Monsanto shouldn't be setting public policy and determining when it's okay
to grow GM wheat.

Stewart Wells is president of the National Farmers Union. Holly Penfound is
environmental health campaign coordinator for Greenpeace Canada.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics | Espaņol | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Volunteer | Donate | About | Email This Page

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice:The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.