Front page

We’re being told there’s an urgent public health necessity to censor vaccine misinformation.

What is this assumption based on? Who gets to decide what is “misinformation” and whether it should be censored?

These aren’t theoretical questions for the Organic Consumers Association. 

Despite our reticence and self-censorship, the Organic Consumers Association was put on a list of vaccine safety advocates that the House Energy & Commerce Committee has sent to Facebook, Google and Twitter, demanding our deplatforming.

We have a theory about how this hit list was compiled. The targeted vaccine safety advocates are all natural health practitioners and educators and supporters of organic food and farming. 

Has the unholy alliance between agribusiness and the pharmaceutical industry, exemplified by the Bayer-Monsanto merger, given these corporations an added incentive to team up to take out their biggest detractors?

That possibility occurred to us when, despite our reticence and self-censorship, the Organic Consumers Association was put on a hit list of vaccine safety advocates known as the “Disinformation Dozen.”

We noticed that Voices for Vaccines was one of the pharmaceutical front-groups that’s been circulating the hit list and that it is a project of the Task Force for Global Health, which is funded by vaccine and pharmaceutical companies―including Bayer.

There are proven and profitable agricultural practices that have the power to draw excess carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.

But, before agriculture can be a climate change solution, it has to deal with its own greenhouse gas pollution.

Synthetic fertilizers and factory farms must be phased out, while regenerative organic practices that sequester carbon are ramped up.

There’s certainly a lot of potential, especially on grasslands where ruminant animals can forage for the entirety of their lives instead of being fattened on synthetic-fertilizer-grown grains in greenhouse-gas-polluting factory farm feedlots.

We can get grazing animals off grain and phase out of factory farms by increasing on-farm and farmer-owned processing capacity, so that farmers can act independently of the meat and grain monopolies.

But, it won’t be easy to steer clear of these multi-billion-dollar agribusinesses. They’re always one step ahead, working with their supporters in government on false solutions to perpetuate the industrial food system and avoid addressing the systemic causes of our climate crisis.

After almost 18 months since COVID-19 first came to international attention, and caused a global pandemic, no animal source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been found despite an enormous search effort.

Every proposed source such as the Wuhan Seafood Market, Pangolins, Bats, Snakes and processed food imported into China has been thoroughly discredited.

There is zero credible evidence for the theory that SARS-CoV-2 arose naturally in wild animals, however there is huge body of compelling evidence that points to a lab release.

There is very convincing evidence for a smoking gun that points to SARS-CoV-2 being the product of Gain-of-Function genetic engineering that has escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

The smoking gun is the make-up of nucleotides in the R codons of the SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site. Each codon is composed of 3 nucleotides. There are four nucleotides that are written as A,G,C and U.