Biotech Industry: Consumers Don’t Need to Know Whether Food is Genetically Engineered

Activists rejoiced last week when a hard-fought battle over international standards for labeling genetically modified food came to an end - finally - after decades of debate.

July 10, 2011 | Source: Las Angelous Times | by Eryn Brown

For related articles and more information, please visit OCA’s Genetic Engineering page and our Millions Against Monsanto page.

Activists rejoiced last week when a hard-fought battle over international standards for labeling genetically modified food came to an end – finally – after decades of debate.

But the agreement, which many say opens the door for labels to be placed on such foods, will probably have little effect on food labels in the U.S. for the foreseeable future.

And that could be a good thing, some scientists said.

“The public gets bogged down on whether [crops are] genetically engineered or not. We think that’s a distraction,” said Pamela Ronald, a professor of plant pathology at UC Davis. “The consumer needs to know: Is it safe to eat?”

Delegates to the so-called Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body created in 1963 by the United Nations to set voluntary standards for food safety and handling, have been arguing over labels for genetically engineered food for the better part of 20 years.

Concerned that the biotech food is not adequately tested and could be unsafe for people or the environment, some countries, particularly ones in Europe, have pushed for mandatory labeling. Others, including the U.S., have argued that such labels are misleading because the genetically modified products that are on the market have been thoroughly tested and deemed safe.