OCA's Blog
The rapid and persistent degeneration of public and planetary health has metastasized into a global crisis, threatening our very survival.
We are a team of scientists, farmers, activists, artists, physicians, and lawyers that have come together to facilitate and catalyze a global movement and alliance dedicated to regenerating personal and public health. Our work is based on the fundamental principles that food is medicine, and that human health, mental, physical and spiritual, are directly related to societal, environmental, and planetary health.
We call this “collaboratory” Regeneration Health International (RHI), a sister organization to Regeneration International, dedicated to the principles and implementation of regenerative, organic food, farming and land use.
I got COVID-19, and I recovered. Below are the details of my experience and the COVID treatment protocols I used to get better.
I want to paint an honest picture of what getting COVID-19 was like. There are cases of people who got it but are largely asymptomatic or have symptoms akin to a cold. In contrast, I got decently sick - overall still considered mild COVID but akin to some of the tougher flu cases I have experienced. It took me a full two weeks until I could say I was recovered, which is pretty typical for mild cases.
While getting COVID-19 was no walk in the park, too often, the media paints too fearful a picture of it, emphasizing dying people on ventilators and then long-haul COVID. The truth is that over one hundred million Americans, including myself, have recovered from COVID-19.
Vaccine mania is sweeping the nation. One cannot go a day without hearing about the COVID vaccine and the need for increased vaccination rates so “we can get back to normal.” However, since the COVID vaccine supply is now exceeding demand, it reveals that many people do not want the vaccine, and public health authorities are turning to more “coercive” incentives.
Media organizations are pressuring people to get the vaccine by name-calling, universities are requiring the COVID vaccine for those wanting to attend college, criminals are being offered reduced sentences for vaccinating, and businesses are using vaccine passports as an “incentive” to vaccinate despite the public backlash against them and the new inequalities it is creating. All of this occurs in the backdrop of censorship of public health criticism by Big Tech that is implicitly encouraged by lawmakers.
On December 30, 2019, Dr. Li Wenliang sent a message to doctors in Wuhan warning them about a deadly disease outbreak and advising them to wear protective clothing to avoid infection. He was arrested by the Public Security Bureau. Dr. Li was released from detention on Jan. 3 after he was forced to sign a statement about "making false comments" that had "severely disturbed the social order".
The police document stated: ”We solemnly warn you: If you keep being stubborn, with such impertinence, and continue this illegal activity, you will be brought to justice - is that understood?" Dr Li was forced to write: "Yes, I do” so he could avoid being jailed. He was just one of many people the police were intimidating with jail threats for "making false comments”.
On Dec. 31, Chinese authorities informed the World Health Organization (WHO) about the new pneumonia cases in Wuhan. They stated that it came from wild animals in a wet market and that there was no evidence of human to human transmission, only animal to human transmission. The WHO parroted this information. This was the beginning of the falsified zoonosis (natural origins) narrative - that this virus came from an animal and did not leak from a laboratory.
In Part 1 of this series, we looked at how vaccine passports create new inequalities in an already fractured society and raise moral dilemmas due to the inconvenient truth of vaccine injury.
Still, an important question remains: why is there a pervasive lack of questioning of the dilemmas posed by vaccine passports and the COVID response?
Given the magnitude of changes associated with the COVID response and the potential for harm by those changes, one would think there would be greater questioning by the more educated classes and the progressive elements in society.
We all want to get back to normal. The Biden administration says we can “get back to normal by Christmas” if we get vaccination rates up. Critical to this plan is the adoption of the vaccine passport by the business community. The message of “getting back to normal” is an enticing one for a public tired of COVID restrictions. But we should take caution here.
During the pandemic, the government public health institutions promised us solutions that failed to meet expectations. Based on faulty Imperial College models, we were promised lockdowns as a short-term solution that would contain the pandemic.We were promised that mask mandates would stop COVID-19 despite their ambiguous evidence for efficacy and the later evidence that showed less than promised benefits.
On Wednesday April 28, the day before the release of Ronnie Cummins and Dr. Joseph Mercola's new book, The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal, please join us at 8 pm Eastern for a COVID-19 tribunal exposing willful misconduct.
Learn how you can take action!
In late 2019, when a novel pandemic virus emerged, likely from a lab accident involving gain-of-function research on experimental new vaccines, the vaccine companies, their investors and their partners in government were ready. They had been anticipating such a scenario for years and were prepared to exploit the pandemic as an opportunity to trial the same new vaccine technologies under Emergency Use Authorizations. To meet the legal requirements for Emergency Use, they needed two things: 1) an "emergency," and 2) an absence of an "adequate, approved, and available alternative" to the new vaccines.
Understand this and the inexplicable conduct of our so-called "public health" officials starts to make sense. They aren't idiots and they're not making mistakes. What we're seeing is willful misconduct.
RSVP for our virtual book party, live on Wednesday, April 28, 8 pm Eastern - A COVID Tribunal Exposing Willful Misconduct: Learn How You Can Take Action
OCA readers who are not email subscribers to Organic Bytes, but who are among our 1.2 million followers and friends on Facebook may have noticed that we now, for the first time in 20 years, are being forced to publish two different editions of Organic Bytes, one that is uncensored (for our email subscribers), and one that is censored, for our Facebook readers and social media followers. You can find the uncensored versions of Organic Bytes (including back issues) on our website along with our ongoing comprehensive coverage of COVID-19.
The supposed World Health Organization-Chinese government“investigation” into the origins of COVID-19 is becoming widely exposed in the global media as a sham, orchestrated by Chinese Communist officials, WHO bureaucrats (funded by the US, China, and Bill Gates), complicit scientists who carry out dangerous lab engineering of viruses, and US funders of the Wuhan Lab disaster including Anthony Fauci from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Peter Daszak from the Eco-Health Alliance.
Around 68 percent of the world’s agricultural lands (eight billion acres as compared to four billion acres of croplands) are used for grazing. The majority of these landscapes are unsuitable for cropping. They are home to over a billion people who are dependent on the livestock that graze on them for their living. These landscapes are often some of most degraded lands on the planet due to deforestation and inappropriate grazing practices.
The good news is that there are a range of grazing systems that are proven to regenerate these ecosystems, increasing ground covers, biodiversity, soil organic matter, water holding capacity, and production outcomes.
