HONOLULU — A federal judge said Monday that the key question before her in lawsuits related to a Maui County ban on the cultivation of genetically modified crops is whether federal and state law trump county law.

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Susan Oki Mollway said she aims to rule on the issue by the end of the month.

Michael Carroll, a lawyer for a citizens group that sponsored a Maui County ballot initiative creating the ban, told Mollway that the federal and state governments aren’t regulating genetically engineered crops and so the county has the authority to regulate them.

But an attorney for Monsanto Co. and Dow Chemical Co. unit Agrigenetics Inc. — both of which research genetically engineered crops in Maui County — told Mollway the state and federal governments already regulate the crops. Margery Bronster said the county doesn’t have the authority to do so.

Mollway is considering two separate lawsuits on the same topic.

The first, filed by the seed companies and their allies, challenges a Maui County law created when voters passed a ballot initiative last year. The law imposes a moratorium on GMO crops until scientific studies are conducted on their safety and benefits.

The second, filed by five citizens who sponsored the ballot initiative, seeks to compel the county to enforce the ordinance.

Both Bronster and Carroll pointed to work performed by a Hawaii state Department of Agriculture biotechnology specialist to support their arguments.

Bronster said the specialist’s mandate was to inspect every regulated field in the state, and he conducted over 1,000 inspections on fields during the last fiscal year. “The regulations at both the state and federal level set out elaborate requirements of what needs to be done,” Bronster told Mollway.

But Carroll countered that the same state worker testified he found dozens of herbicides during his inspections, but he didn’t know what they meant because there weren’t any Environmental Protection Agency benchmarks or health standards for the substances.