“Gain-of-Function” Lab Work Is Euphemism for Bioweapons

Twitter CEO Elon Musk on Wednesday likened “Gain of Function” lab work to the creation of bioweapons. Three years ago, many people thought biowarfare didn’t exist. That that genie had been put in a bottle. That was wrong as I and others repeatedly argued. Now, the sensible thing is to end it.

April 1, 2023 | Source: husseini | by Sam Husseini

Twitter CEO Elon Musk on Wednesday likened “Gain of Function” lab work to the creation of bioweapons.

This is something I’ve been saying at least since early 2020. Francis Boyle, who wrote the U.S. implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, has been saying it for decades, see the documentary “Anthrax War”. Boyle just appeared on the infamous Alex Jones Show warning of the proposed pandemic treaty — arguing it is a remarkable power grab by WHO that brazenly violates the U.S. Constitution. (People should look at arguments being made and evidence, not deride the outlet that important information might come from. I’m sure Boyle would be happy to have his analysis aired on CNN or “Democracy Now” but apparently invitations were not forthcoming.)

Gain-of-Function is a ridiculous euphemism. What “gains function” is the pathogen. It’s lab work that makes viruses and other pathogens more deadly and/or more transmissible.