Organic Consumers Association

Campaigning for health, justice, sustainability, peace, and democracy

Debunking the Stubborn Myth that Only Industrial Ag Can 'Feed the World'

For related articles and more information, please visit OCA's All About Organics page, USDA Watch page, Genetic Engineering page, and our Millions Against Monsanto page.

I've written about it once already, but I want to return to The Economist's  recent special series  about how industrial agriculture is the true and only way to feed the 9 billion people who will inhabit the world by 2050. The framing, I think, is extremely interesting.

The widely revered magazine identifies two strains of thought on the food system's future: one serious and one frivolous.

The serious one -- made up of "food companies, plant breeders, and international development agencies" -- is "concerned mainly with feeding the world's growing population," which it plans to do "through the spread of modern farming, plant research and food processing in poor countries."

The frivolous one -- "influential among non-governmental organizations and some consumers" -- "concentrates more on the food problems of richer countries, such as concerns about animal welfare and obesity," The Economist writes. This group fixates on the question of "what should we have for dinner," but has little to say about feeding the globe's growing population. And since The Economist's special report "concentrates on the problems of feeding the 9 billion," not the trivial omnivorous dilemmas of wealthy Berkeleyites, the magazine throws its lot in with the companies, plant breeders, and international development agencies -- the Serious People Looking for Real Solutions for Feeding the World.

Get Local

Find News and Action for your state: