Organic Consumers Association

Campaigning for health, justice, sustainability, peace, and democracy

Labs Don't Have to Report 'Frankenfish' Escapes

Web Note: Ecological studies predicted that GM fish can eliminate native species and then self destruct. I have included a current article on the lax regulation of GM fish in Canada and an article pointing out the risks or releasing GM fish to the environment that was published in 1999. That article should have been known by Canadian regulators along with many other studies showing the clear risk of escaping transgenic fish. This matter is a matter of International concern not just a local concern for Canadians. The widespread spread of GM canola to conventional canola crops was acceptable to the regulators in Canada but the same lax regulation could readily lead to destruction of the international fishery.

From the Toronto Star:
OTTAWA­ - Canada's rules for genetically modified fish are so lax that labs don't have to report escapes into the wild, says an audit released today. That means bigger, more adaptable fish engineered in labs could put the natural variety at a disadvantage when they compete against each other for food and territory, the audit by Canada's environment commissioner has found. And because scientists don't have to disclose what they create in their labs, it says, it's not known what sort of so-called `Frankenfish' might someday swim Canada's water systems. "The result of these weaknesses is that the extent of research under way in Canada and any accidental release of (genetically engineered) fish may not be fully known," the audit says. The Canadian Environment Protection Act of 1999 currently regulates biotechnology, but the audit says separate rules for genetically modified fish could close some of the gaps it found. "In our view, new regulations could address the weaknesses of Canada's current regulations in this area," says the report. "This includes the need to strengthen oversight of research and develop mandatory reporting requirements for GE (genetically engineered) fish and for accidental releases of genetically engineered organisms into the environment." Fisheries and Oceans has long conceded it needs separate regulations for the manmade fish, but the department still has not drafted its own policy. And the audit says the department no longer intends to. Although the department agreed with a recommendation in the environment commissioner's 2004 audit that a separate policy was needed, officials later decided against it. "Department officials told us that the 2004 commitment to revise and finalize a policy in response to our audit was made without a full understanding of the applicable ... provisions," the audit says. Research on genetically modified fish began in the early 1980s. Canada doesn't have its own commercial farms for genetically modified fish, but a U.S. company has had a Canadian subsidiary on Prince Edward Island since 1994. The company asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2006 to allow it to sell its fish as food. Canadian government officials say it's reasonable to expect a similar request to sell the fish in Canada, the audit says.

Get 20% off Mercola products, plus 20% of the sale goes to Organic Consumers Association.

Get Local

Find News and Action for your state:
Regeneration International

Cool the planet.
Feed the world.