Another report sounding the alarm about climate change.
Another missed opportunity to talk about the most promising solution: regenerative agriculture.
Earlier this week New York Times cited a new report by the notoriously conservative Government Accountability Office (GAO), which said “climate change is costing taxpayers billions.”
CNN also reported on the GAO study, which calls on Trump to “craft appropriate responses.”
The CNN coverage noted several initiatives to combat climate change undertaken under the Obama administration—the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which sought to lower carbon emissions on a state-by-state basis, and the Paris climate agreement, which saw almost every country agree to voluntary limits on future carbon emissions.
The current climate-denying Trump administration wants to scrap those and other climate initiatives, in favor of prioritizing corporate profits.
But that’s not why I’m writing today. I’m writing because once again, a major report on the costs—financial, social, environmental, political—of doing nothing to slow runaway global warming focuses exclusively on reducing carbon emissions. The new report fails to mention that even if we achieved zero emissions tomorrow, we’re still in big trouble—unless we draw down and sequester into the soil and forests the 200 billion tons of excess carbon already lodged in the atmosphere.