Simple Method Found to Vastly Increase Crop Yields

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:48:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard Wolfson <>
Subject: GEN8-22
New York Times
August 22, 2000

In a stunning new result from what has become one of the largest
agricultural experiments ever, thousands of rice farmers in China have
doubled the yields of their most valuable crop and nearly eliminated its
most devastating disease -- without using chemical treatments or spending a
single extra penny.

Under the direction of an international team of scientists, farmers in
China's Yunnan Province implemented a simple change in their rice paddies.
Instead of planting the large stands of a single type of rice, as they
typically have done, the farmers planted a mixture of two different rices.

With this one change, growers were able to radically restrict the incidence
of rice blast -- the most important disease of this most important staple
in the world. Within just two years, farmers were able to abandon the
chemical fungicides previously widely used to fight the disease. "I wasn't
surprised that the system worked but I was surprised that it worked so
well," said Dr. Christopher Mundt, population biologist at Oregon State
University and the one American-based author on the study, which was
published in the current edition of the journal Nature. "I'm excited about
the possibilities. There is a lot of potential even beyond rice."

Dr. Youyong Zhu, plant pathologist at Yunnan Agricultural University, heads
the mostly China-based research team whose study now covers 100,000 acres
and involves tens of thousands of farmers.

In fact, many researchers have long argued that planting a diversity of
crops should lead to benefits like greater productivity and the suppression
of disease, compared with single variety plantings known as monocultures.

Yet the use of diversity and other ecologically based cures for
agricultural ills have tended to be viewed as more politically correct than
economically viable. Scientists say that this latest study shows that such
environmentally friendly methods can be highly effective, even more
effective, in this case, than standard chemical pesticides.

Calling the results "very significant," Dr. Alison Power, agricultural
ecologist at Cornell University, said, "People have said that these kinds
of ecological approaches wouldn't work on a commercial scale. This is a
huge scale." She added, "We have more alternatives that are really viable
than we often think about or include in our arsenal of possibilities."
Those studying natural ecosystems also welcomed the new work, saying it
closely paralleled findings for the role of species diversity in reducing
the incidence of disease in the wild.

"It's an important study," said Dr. David Tilman, ecologist at the
University of Minnesota. "It's going to raise a great deal of interest."
The scientific hypothesis behind the study, the latest in a growing number
examining the effects of biodiversity, is simple. If one variety of a crop
is susceptible to a disease, the more concentrated those susceptible types
are, the more easily disease can spread and the more victims it can claim.

The disease should be less likely to spread, however, if susceptible plants
are separated from one another by other kinds of plants that do not succumb
to the disease and can act as a barrier.

Rice blast fungus, which destroys millions of tons of rice and costs
farmers several billion dollars in losses each year, moves from plant to
plant as an airborne spore -- a method of transport that should easily be
blocked by a row of disease-resistant plants.

Scientists tested the hypothesis by asking farmers to plant their farms in
experimental plots using two kinds of rice: a standard rice that does not
usually succumb to rice blast disease and a much more valuable sticky rice
known to be highly susceptible.

Farmers also planted control plots of monocultures, allowing scientists to
rigorously test the importance of the mixtures in the health and
productivity on these farms.

What scientists found was that farmers garnered even more benefit from the
mixtures than expected. Resistant plants did block the airborne spores in a
field, but as more and more farmers became involved in the study, these
positive effects began to multiply across the region. Not only were disease
spores not blowing in from the next row, they were no longer coming from
the next farmer's field either or the next or the next, rapidly damping the
spread of the disease on a grand scale.

In addition, scientists found that the sticky rice plants, which poked up
above the shorter, standard rice plants with which they were grown enjoyed
sunnier, warmer and drier conditions than they would have in a stand of
tall, sticky rice plants. These conditions appeared to discourage the
growth of the fungal rice blast in the sticky rice plants.

The fact that rice blast is the most devastating disease of rice, the
staple crop of most people worldwide, would alone make the study important.

Scientists interviewed said there was no reason, however, why mixtures
could not decrease disease spread in other crops as well, though how
powerful and useful a remedy it will be is likely to vary.

"There's already a lot of work with barley in Europe and coffee in
Colombia," said Dr. Mundt. "I've seen beautiful disease reduction in
mixtures of willows grown in England." The study is of particular interest
for organic farming as it involves the application of no chemicals.

"Biodiversity is an absolutely essential tool for organic production," said
Dr. Martin Wolfe, director of research at Elm Farm Research Centre, an
agricultural research institute. "It's an essential part of the armory."
Yet, Dr. Wolfe said, even organic farmers underuse diversity, as they also
have been indoctrinated in the simplicity of and seduced by the
universality of monocultures.

Some of the obstacles to using different varieties include the extra work
of keeping track of and maintaining a diversity of plants that can require
different kinds of tending and harvesting. If kinds of crops require
different harvesting methods or are harvested at different times, it can
increase the effort a farmer must expend in a given field.

In Yunnan province, farmers harvested rice grains by hand, making it simple
to gather and sell the two rice varieties separately. Some scientists argue
such problems can also be overcome with mechanized harvesting. In the
Pacific Northwest where an increasing number of farmers are using mixtures
of wheat to increase yields and cut down disease, growers may choose
varieties that differ in useful qualities, such as resistance to disease,
but that can still be harvested and sold together.

Researchers say the study's implications extend to prairies, rainforests
and other natural ecosystems.

Just as the new study examines the role of a diversity of crops in fighting
disease and in productivity of a rice paddy, biodiversity studies have been
examining whether increased species number can affect such things as the
health of plants in natural settings.

So far the two kinds of studies appear to support one another well. For
example, Dr. Tilman and Charles Mitchell, an ecologist at University of
Minnesota, have found evidence in prairie ecosystems that an increased
diversity of plant species decreases the incidence of disease. As in the
rice paddies, in natural ecosystems, when there is a greater diversity of
plants, it is simply more difficult for the disease to spread.

"There's been quite a push by the agrotech industry to market genetically
engineered crops and genetically homogeneous crops that perform really
well," said Dr. Shahid Naeem, ecologist at the University of Washington.

"But what's really neat about this paper is that it shows how we've lost
sight of the fact that there are some really simple things we can do in the
field to manage crops."

Richard Wolfson, PhD
Consumer Right to Know Campaign
for Mandatory labelling and long-term
testing of genetically engineered food
500 Wilbrod Street, Ottawa, ON Canada K1N 6N2
subscription to genetic engineering news of 12 months
is $35 (payable to BanGEF at above address)
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it
for research and educational purposes.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.