Organic Consumers Association

From Aguascalientes to Caracoles

October 12, 2003
From Aguascalientes to Caracoles
By Justin Podur
ZNet Commentary

For some 10 years, the Zapatistas have inspired people all over the world.
The Zapatistas' 'Autonomous Municipalities', in particular, have been models
of community organization and democratic self-governance. These
municipalities managed to provide not only better basic services (health,
education, culture, infrastructure) than the Mexican state ever had, but
they did so in spite of violent opposition by the (US-backed) state and the
paramilitary auxiliaries it employed.

The democratic decision-making processes within the municipalities, as well
as the way they invited and accepted the help of outsiders willing to share
genuine solidarity, were examples from which movements all over the world
tried to learn.

It was therefore a surprise for many when the Zapatistas announced the
'death' of the Autonomous Municipalities, scheduled for August 8, 2003, to
be followed by a 'birth' of something new on August 9-all of which was to
coincide with a big party. Supporters from all over Mexico and the world
traveled to the Zapatista rebel municipality of Oventic, in the highlands of
Chiapas, to witness the rebirth of the autonomous communities from August
8-10, 2003.

Subcomandante Marcos extended the invitation to everyone "who, over these
ten years, have supported the rebel communities, whether with projects, or
with peace camps, or with caravans, or with an attentive ear, or with the
compaera word, whatever it may be, as long as it was not with pity and

Pity and Charity

Frustration with 'pity and charity' from solidarity groups motivated some of
the changes that the Zapatistas announced last month. In a communique about
some of these changes, Marcos described some of the frustrating actions by
parts of the Zapatista solidarity movement over the years:
"we tried to learn from our encuentros with national and international civil
society. But we also expected them to learn. The zapatista movement arose,
among other things, in demand of respect. And it so happened that we didn't
always receive respect. And it's not that they insulted us. Or at least not
intentionally. But, for us, pity is an affront, and charity is a slap in the
face. "

The most outrageous example of this kind of slap in the face was cited by
Marcos at length, and is worth reproducing:
"I saved an example of "humanitarian aid" for the chiapaneco indigenous,
which arrived a few weeks ago: a pink stiletto heel, imported, size
61/2...without its mate. I always carry it in my backpack in order to remind
myself, in the midst of interviews, photo reports and attractive sexual
propositions, what we are to the country after the first of January [1994]:
a Cinderella. (...)

"These good people who, sincerely, send us a pink stiletto heel, size 61/2,
imported, without its mate...thinking that, poor as we are, we'll accept
anything, charity and alms. How can we tell all those good people that no,
we no longer want to continue living Mexico's shame. In that part that has
to be prettied up so it doesn't make the rest look ugly. No, we don't want
to go on living like that."

The second stiletto never arrived. Marcos also decried
"a more sophisticated charity. It's the one that a few NGOs and
international agencies practice. It consists, broadly speaking, in their
deciding what the communities need, and, without even consulting them,
imposing not just specific projects, but also the times and means of their
implementation. Imagine the desperation of a community that needs drinkable
water and they're saddled with a library. The one that requires a school for
the children, and they give them a course on herbs."
In addition to the unbalanced development due to the flawed relationship
with international aid and solidarity movements, there are internal reasons
that the Zapatistas are seeking to make changes.

Governing by Obeying
The practice of 'governing by obeying', which pre-dates the Zapatista
presence in Chiapas, is one by which authorities are monitored carefully by
the community and recalled and replaced when necessary. The EZLN tried to
use these practices, honed at the local level, in regional governance:
"Functioning with local responsables (that is, those in charge of the
organization in each community), regional ones (a group of communities) and
area ones (a group of regions), the EZLN saw that those who did not
discharge their duties were, in a natural fashion, replaced by another.
Although here, given that it is a political-military organization, the
command makes the final decision."

The result was that the dictates of military organization interfered with
democracy and self-governance in the municipalities. When human rights
organizations sought to lodge complaints against Zapatistas, it was unclear
who the human rights organizations ought to try to hold accountable: the
EZLN itself, or the Autonomous Municipalities?

Good Government Juntas
In order to try to address these problems, the Autonomous Municipalities
have been reorganized into 'Good Government Juntas' (as distinguished from
the 'Bad Government', which is what the Zapatistas call the government).
The Good Government Juntas will "be seated in the `Caracoles,' with one
junta for each rebel region, and it will be formed by 1 or 2 delegates from
each one of the Autonomous Councils of that region. The following will
continue to be the exclusive government functions of the Rebel Zapatista

Autonomous Municipalities:
"the provision of justice; community health; education; housing; land; work;
food; commerce; information and culture, and local movement. "The
Clandestine Revolutionary Indigenous Committee in each region will monitor
the operations of the Good Government Juntas in order to prevent acts of
corruption, intolerance, injustice and deviation from the zapatista
principle of `Governing Obeying.'"

Some new regulations by the Good Government Juntas: 1) Donations from the
outside will no longer be allowed to be earmarked to anyone in particular,
to a specific community, or to a particular municipality. This will help
balance the unbalanced development that has been going on. 2) Only people
and organizations registered with a Good Government Junta will be recognized
as Zapatistas, preventing swindles from occurring where non-Zapatistas pose
as Zapatistas, collecting money and even offering 'military training'-which
the real Zapatistas do not do and have not done.

The EZLN hopes that all this will have the following result:
"And so, members of civil society will now know with whom they must reach
agreement for projects, peace camps, visits, donations and etcetera. Human
rights defenders will now know to whom they should turn over the denuncias
they receive and from whom they should expect a response. The army and the
police now know whom to attack (just bearing in mind that we, meaning the
EZLN, have already gotten involved there).

"The media which says what they're paid to say now know whom to slander
and/or ignore. Honest media now know where they can go in order to request
interviews or stories on the communities. The federal government and its
`commissioner' now know what they have to do to not exist. And the Power of
Money now knows who else they should fear."

If the Zapatistas are making changes, those who oppose them are acting with
predictable continuity. Even before the party, a senator from the National
Action Party (PAN), the party currently in power in Mexico, said the PAN
opposed the Zapatistas' attempt to 'create a state within a state', a
willful misrepresentation of the Zapatistas' position refuted years before.
Since then, paramilitary activity around at least one of the Caracoles, the
"Caracol Que Habla Para Todos," (Roberto Barrios Autonomous Municipality),
has increased. Paramilitary leaders in that community have been firing
warning shots and threatening and insulting Zapatista supporters.
For all the changes, several things remain the same. The authorities will
still not leave the Zapatistas in peace. And the Zapatistas continue to
build their autonomous communities, and to teach the world what solidarity
really means.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.