Organic Consumers Association

10 years of NAFTA Destroying Mexican Farmers

Mexico: NAFTA at 10—Growing Strains Robert Taylor World Press Review contributing editor Jan, 2003

A Mexican farmer lets cows roam freely at the entrance of the Deputies Chamber in Mexico City, Dec. 4, 2002, to protest the North American Free Trade Agreement (Photo: AFP). The 10th anniversary of the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has fueled a vigorous debate in the Mexican press over the steep price that the nation’s most vulnerable economic sectors have paid for closer economic integration with the United States and Canada.

The government of President Vicente Fox has reaffirmed its commitment to the treaty—including the controversial elimination of most remaining Mexican duties on agricultural imports from its NAFTA partners. But political pressure is building for suspension or renegotiation of terms for trade liberalization and increased relief for domestic sectors damaged by foreign competition.

The specter of a fresh wave of foreign agricultural imports flooding the Mexican market has become a source of widespread alarm among Mexican commentators. “The lamentable present situation of Mexican farming is of such gravity that...the chief executive has the obligation to renegotiate the Free Trade Agreement,” argued Enrique del Val Blanco in El Universal (Dec. 5). He asserted that Washington’s demands for opening of the Mexican market to U.S. farm goods lose credibility in view of its persistent use of subsidies, sanitary regulations, and other legal restraints to protect its own agricultural sector from...foreign imports.

By addressing these issues directly in a renegotiation of terms for NAFTA agricultural trade, “Perhaps more favorable paths will be opened for Mexican farmers, not just the brutal application of the laws of the market by rich countries that maintain undisguised protections and subsidies for their own citizens.” NAFTA critics decried the Fox administration’s proposal of a 102-billion-peso ($9.9 billion) relief program for Mexican farmers in 2003 as an attempt to repackage existing assistance with modest supplementary aid to contain the political damage of the Jan. 1 elimination of most farm import duties. “For nine years, the United States has launched an offensive of agri-food products against our country in the name of NAFTA,” Víctor Quintana wrote in La Jornada (Nov. 26). “Our defenses have been so weakened that we now depend on imports for 40 percent of the foods we consume.”

In the face of the looming “blitzkrieg” of zero farm tariffs at the start of 2003, he added, “Only one shield is possible: the declaration of an economic and social state of emergency in farming and a three-year moratorium on implementation of the agricultural provisions of NAFTA.” Luis Hernández Navarro observed in La Jornada (Dec. 3) that Mexico’s dramatic transformation from “a closed and protected economy into one of the most open in the world”—sealed with the signing of NAFTA in December 1992—has begun to draw business and popular resistance. “The injured from this process have received neither compensation nor the opportunity for retraining,” he asserted, while “the ranks of the excluded have swelled with the victims of the policy....The uneasiness with free resounds in all corners of the country.”

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.