Ralph Nader on Corporate Patrioiotism

Ralph Nader on Corporate Patrioiotism

Corporate Patriotism
by Ralph Nader

U. S. corporations aren't even subtle about it. Waving a flag and
carrying a big shovel, corporate interests are scooping up government
benefits and taxpayer money in an unprecedented fashion while the
public is preoccupied with the September 11 attacks and the war in

Shamelessly, the Bush Administration and Congress have taken advantage
of the patriotic outpouring to fulfill the wish lists of their most
generous corporate campaign donors. Not only is the Treasury being
raided, but regulations protecting everything from personal privacy to
environmental safeguards are under attack by well-heeled lobbyists who
want to stampede Congress to act while the media and citizens are

Only a handful in the Congress--members like Senator Russell Feingold
of Wisconsin and Representatives Peter DeFazio of Oregon and Barbara
Lee of California--have shown the courage to question the giveaways
and the quick wipeout of civil liberties and other citizen
protections. In most cases, such as the $15 billion airline bailout
and corporate tax breaks, legislation has been pushed to the forefront
with little or no hearings and only fleeting consideration on the
floor of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

One of the boldest grabs for cash has been by corporations seeking to
eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), which was enacted during
the Reagan Administration to prevent profitable corporations from
escaping all tax liability through various loopholes. Not only do the
corporations want relief from the current year's AMT taxes, but they
are seeking a retroactive refund of all AMT taxes paid since 1986.

This giveaway, as passed by the House of Representatives, would make
corporations eligible for $25 billion in tax refunds. Just 14
corporations would receive $6.3 billion of the refund. IBM gets $1.4
billion; General Motors, $833 million; General Electric $671 million;
Daimler-Chrysler $600 million; Chevron-Texaco $572 million. The 14
biggest beneficiaries of the minimum tax repeal gave $14,769,785 in
"soft money" to the national committees of the Democratic and
Republican parties in recent years.

Soon to join the bailout parade is the nation's insurance industry,
which is lobbying the Congress to have the federal government pick up
the tab for future losses like those stemming from the attack on the
World Trade Center. Proposals are on the table for taxpayers to either
pick up losses above certain levels or to provide loans or loan
guarantees for reinsurance.

The insurance companies want federal bailouts, but they continue to
insist on regulation only by underfunded, poorly staffed state
insurance departments, most of which are dominated by the industry.
Any bailout or loan program involving the insurance companies must
include provisions which ensure that insurance companies cannot refuse
to write policies and make investments in low, moderate and minority
neighborhoods. Allegations about insurance company "redlining" or
discrimination against citizens in these areas have been prevalent for
many years. It would be a terrible injustice for citizens to be forced
to pay taxes to help bail out insurance companies that discriminate
against them. Congress needs to address this issue before it even
considers public assistance for the industry.

People-concerns have been missing in all the bailouts. When the
airline companies walked off with $15 billion plus in bailout money,
the thousands of laid-off employees--airline attendants, maintenance
crews, baggage handlers and ticket counter employees--received not a
dime. Attempts to include health benefits and other help for these
employees were shouted down on the floor of the House of

Last month, more than 400,000 employees lost their jobs nationwide and
the national unemployment rate rose to 5.4 percent, the highest level
since 1996. The Bureau of Labor Statistics said roughly a fourth of
the lost jobs were the direct result of the terrorist attacks of
September 11. Bailouts, benefits or other aid for these victims of the
attacks? No, that's reserved just for the corporations under the
policies of the Bush Administration and the present Congress.

Yet it is the workers in the low-wage jobs--like those in restaurants,
hotels, retailing and transportation--who are bearing the brunt of the
layoffs in the aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center,
according to a report from the New York State Department of Labor.
Almost 25,000 people told the department that they lost their jobs
because of the trade center disaster. An analysis by the department of
the first 22,000 of the claims found that 16 percent worked at bars,
14 percent worked at hotels, 5 percent worked in air transportation
and 21 percent in a category termed "business services." Only 4
percent worked at Wall Street brokerage firms.

While more workers lose jobs, the Administration is pushing for
authority to expand the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
under new "fast-track" authority. The Department of Commerce concedes
that at least 360,000 jobs have been lost under NAFTA, and private
research groups estimate the total may be twice that number. Now, with
unemployment rising to alarming levels, the Administration decides to
cave to pro-NAFTA corporate demands which will only make the labor
picture worse. No bailout for laid off workers, just a hard crack
across the knees.

As Bill Moyers, the author and national journalist, commented: "They
(the corporations) are counting on your patriotism to distract you
from their plunder. They're counting on you to stand at attention with
your hand over your heart, pledging allegiance to the flag, while they
pick your pocket."

The present crisis cries out for shared sacrifice--not the opportunism
so blatantly displayed by the nation's corporate interests. President
Bush and the Congress must summon the courage to resist the
self-serving demands--the kind of courage and shared sacrifice that
guided the brave rescue workers on September 11.

For More Information:

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.