New York Times Reports on Launch of New Coalition
to Drive GE Foods off the Market

The New York Times

July 19, 2000

Food Companies Urged to End Use of Biotechnology Products
By Andrew Pollack

A coalition of consumer and environmental groups announced yesterday what
they hope will be the biggest and best-organized effort yet in the United
States to pressure food companies to abandon the use of genetically
modified crops.

Starting with the Campbell Soup Company, the coalition said it would target
well-known food companies and try to generate thousands of consumer
letters, phone calls and signatures on petitions urging them to stop using
genetically modified foods until more testing was done. The group also
wants all companies to label products that contain such ingredients.

In Europe, food companies have largely abandoned the use of such
ingredients because of consumer opposition fanned by aggressive campaigns.
But in the United States, consumers have expressed little concern about genetically
modified foods and many are not even aware that such foods are being sold.

"This is going to be the first sort of sustained effort on the European
model," said Philip E. Clapp, president of the National Environmental
Trust, one of the groups in the coalition, the Genetically Engineered Food Alert.

The coalition could spend $1 million, or more, he said. That is still
considerably below the $50 million a group of agricultural biotechnology
companies committed in April to spend over several years on television
advertising and other measures to defend their products.

The group has named no other targets yet than Campbell. But Jean Halloran
of Consumers Union, which is cooperating with the coalition though not a
member, said the coalition would choose "corporations that have food
products that Americans really regard as staples of their kitchen, that
they feed to their kids." Besides soup, Campbell makes Pepperidge Farm cookies,
V8 juice, Prego pasta sauce and Godiva chocolates.

John Faulkner, a Campbell's spokesman, said the company saw no need to
eliminate genetically engineered ingredients because they were as "equally
nutritious and equally safe" as nonmodified ones. He said that fewer than
one-tenth of 1 percent of calls to the Campbell's consumer hotline
concerned genetic engineering. And even if Campbell wanted to eliminate such
ingredients, he said, it could not, because a large percentage of the corn
and soybeans grown in the United States is genetically altered. "We don't
control the supply chain," he said.

Gene Grabowski, a spokesman for the Grocery Manufacturers of America, a
trade group representing food companies, said the companies were following
federal guidelines that do not require labeling genetically modified
ingredients. "If the activists have an issue, it's not with the food
companies but with the federal government," he said.

Still, pressuring food companies could be effective. Already, companies
like McDonald's, Frito-Lay and Gerber -- whose parent company is Novartis, a
Swiss pharmaceutical giant that makes and sells genetically modified corn
and soybean seeds -- are reducing or eliminating genetically modified
ingredients. They are doing so not because they think they are unsafe but
because they are worried about consumer reaction.

There is no evidence that anyone has been harmed by eating the genetically
engineered corn, soybeans, potatoes or other foods now on the market. Such
crops are typically altered to resist pests and chemicals.

But critics say the foods have not been tested adequately. And they say
labeling would give consumers a choice to avoid them. Food companies oppose
mandatory labeling, saying it would scare consumers away.

Analysts, however, have noted that some dairy products produced from cows
that have not been injected with a bovine growth hormone produced in
bacteria are labeled, and only a very small percentage of consumers seek
them out.

The Food and Drug Administration maintains that labels should pertain to
the quality of the food, not to how it is made. The genetically engineered
foods so far have the same nutritional value and safety as other foods, it says,
so the use of genetic engineering per se should not be on the label.

The other groups in the food alert coalition are the Center for Food
Safety, Friends of the Earth, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy,
Organic Consumers Association, Pesticide Action Network North America and
the State Public Interest Research Groups.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.