Market Pressure Against GE Crops Mounts in Asia & Pacific

Market Pressure Against GE Crops Mounts in
Asia & Pacific

Issue of June 14, 2001
Far Eastern Economic Review
Issue cover-dated June 14, 2001

Saying No to Transgenic Crops
There is a growing worldwide market for non-genetically modified food--
and countries from Brazil to Thailand stand to gain by catering to it
By Anne Marie Ruff/BANGKOK
IN SUPERMARKETS across Asia, bags of potato chips and containers of
infant formula contain ingredients from transgenic (commonly referred to as
genetically modified, or GM) crops. The non-governmental organization
Greenpeace has recently campaigned to expose the widespread use of GM
ingredients--imported from abroad--in Thailand and the Philippines. In the
process, Greenpeace may have also unwittingly exposed a growing market
opportunity for foodstuffs that are certified as not having been made from
GM crops.

Unlike the United States and Canada, Asian countries have not embraced
GM seeds. While Japan has recently approved three GM seed varieties,
China is the only country in Asia growing a GM crop: cotton. But several
countries have imported GM seeds and plants for field trials and GM rice is
under development, with commercial varieties about five years off. Multinational
seed companies have promoted GM seeds as a key technology for feeding
growing populations. But for agricultural exporting countries like Thailand,
India and Vietnam, the marketing benefits of avoiding GM crops may far
outweigh any yield increases or nutritional benefits GM seeds may offer.

Says Wanchai Cherdshewasart, a member of the prime minister's National Board
of Biosafety: "Now is our golden opportunity. Most countries are looking for
non-GM produce. We should take advantage of it." The advantage of non-GM
crops has all to do with consumer perceptions of GM crops. Carole Burke,
editor of Japanscan's Food Industry Bulletin, says, "Japanese consumers are
very concerned about food quality and safety in general, and are very
sceptical about the safety of GM foods."

That same scepticism has spurred several European countries to reject
numerous shipments of American and Canadian GM corn, soya beans and canola.
Thailand's prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, is well aware of how such
consumer sentiment affects export markets. He is hedging his bets, recently
telling a local newspaper, "We should not say that we want or do not want GM
. . . People are just suspicious of the technology."

While some GM commodities have been approved for import into Europe and
Japan, many European governments now require the labelling of foods with GM
ingredients. Asian countries are beginning to follow suit. Some companies
like food-processing giants Unilever and Nestle have eliminated the use of
GM ingredients in their operations in Europe. Japan's top two brewers, Asahi
and Kirin, eliminated GM ingredients several years ago. Says Burke, "All
leading food-processing companies in Japan are very conscious of consumers'
fear of GM foods. Market leaders in all segments of the food industry are
demanding GM-free commodities, and the menus of major restaurant chains note
their foods are GM-free."

As labelling becomes widespread, the demand for GM-free food is likely to
increase and could potentially represent a multibillion-dollar market. Burke
says the growth in demand can be compared to the demand for organic food.
In Japan organic foods represent only 1%-2% of food sales "but will grow
considerably" she says, while organic foods are the fastest growing segment
of food sales in the U.S. In order to meet that demand, U.S. food processor
Archer Daniels Midland has been offering American farmers a premium for
non-GM corn and soya beans of around eight cents a bushel.

But maintaining separate storage and processing facilities for GM and non-GM
commodities requires vigilant tracking which increases costs. To avoid this
complication, Brazil adopted the alternative strategy of simply banning the
import of all GM seeds and commodities. Brazil's new reputation as a reliable
source for non-GM corn and soya beans was the key factor in South Korea's
recent decision to import Brazilian, rather than American, corn. When GM rice
hits the market, demand for non-GM rice will likely follow, and Asia, the world's
ricebowl, will be expected to meet that demand.

In Asia, Thailand is the country best positioned to reliably serve the
non-GM market. More than two years ago, the government banned the import
and cultivation of commercial-GM seeds. While there are currently experimental
field trials of Monsanto's GM cotton, and the government-funded National
Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology is conducting research into
GM papaya, tomato and cucumber, those field trials may not be legal for much


At the urging of Thai NGO Assembly of the Poor, Thaksin's cabinet is
considering a ban on the field-testing of GM seeds and plants. Agricultural
economist, Chaiwat Konjin, who oversees a major Asian Development Bank
agricultural loan in Thailand, says, "It is not in the interest of Thailand
to produce transgenic crops. The trade issue is very important and we must
protect our export markets."

The Philippine Senate tried to pass similar legislation last year. Despite
an active NGO community opposed to GM crops, the move was unsuccessful.
Unlike Thailand, the Philippines is a net importer of food, especially rice,
and is more concerned about feeding its population. The Philippines is also
home to the International Rice Research Institute, which is in the forefront
of research into GM rice. The IRRI's spokesman, Duncan Macintosh, says the
proposed ban was short-sighted and would have been counterproductive. "We
try to keep our research agenda separate from consumer concerns. Because
without the science consumers will never get the facts they need to have a
constructive debate."

China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia and even Thailand are part of the IRRI's
Asian Rice Biotechnology Network, which may eventually develop GM rice
varieties. If such a variety were to come to market, "there is just no way
Japan would accept it," says Burke. "The Japanese are extremely fussy about
their rice." Chaiwat says Thailand is keenly aware of this attitude and
neither the Ministry of Commerce nor the Ministry of Agriculture will
promote GM crops. "We want to protect our own varieties of rice."

Vietnam is the world's second-largest rice exporter, after Thailand, but the
Vietnamese serve a different market segment with lower-quality rice and so
are not as opposed to the idea of GM rice. The governments of China and
Indonesia, like the Philippines, are more concerned about food security than
export-market security and so are not opposed to GM rice. While the Indian
government is cautiously optimistic about GM crops, a delegation of private
soya-bean producers recently visited several European countries to confirm
that Indian soya was still non-GM.

While Thailand's stance toward GM crops may be pre-emptive, it is not simply
forward-looking. Thailand has already run into problems with some of its
export markets. A few months ago, the government of Saudi Arabia rejected
shipments of tuna packed in soya oil produced from GM soybeans, imported
from North America. The two countries have resumed trade in tuna, but Thai
manufacturers must now label the product as GM-free and pay for
certification by a third-party testing facility.

This experience underscores the complexity of the situation and lends
credence to Greenpeace's calls to ban imports of GM commodities from other
countries, which are often used in foods processed in Thailand. But even
with such a wide ban, the genetic genie may already be out of the bottle.

There are reports of Thai farmers smuggling and growing GM seeds from China,
and there is always the possibility that GM seeds and plants will be brought
into the country illegally or by accident. While the verdict is still out on
whether GM crops are a boon for farmers and consumers or a risk with
far-reaching environmental implications, Thailand's pragmatism suggests an
answer already familiar to business: The customer is always right.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.