Greenpeace Denounces Canada Advisory Report on GE Foods

Greenpeace Denounces Canada
Advisory Report on GE Foods

Canada NewsWire
August 23, 2001 Genetic Engineering report: Weak, ge, gm, chernobyl, Meek
and Reeking of biotech bias


Greenpeace Canada today reacted to the release of the Canadian Biotech
Advisory Committee's (CBAC) interim report, calling it
"weak, meek and reeking of biotech bias." The committee, established by
the federal government, is dominated by the biotech industry and its allies.
The committee's process was so skewed, Greenpeace and more than 80
other environmental, health and consumer groups boycotted it.
"This report is weak on science, meek on regulation and reeks of another
government sales job on behalf of the biotech industry," said Dr. Eric
Darier of Greenpeace's genetic engineering campaign. "There's absolutely
nothing here to prevent the environmental release of this unproven genetic
experiment - and nothing that lets Canadians know what they're eating."
"Our worst fears have been confirmed," he said. "The whitewash

Darier noted that the 53 genetic engineering recommendations made last
February by an independent scientific panel of the Royal Society of Canada
- the country's preeminent scientific body - have yet to be acted on by

"Scientists recommended 53 ways to safeguard Canadians from genetic
engineering" said Darier. "Greenpeace calls on the federal government to
wake up and listen to scientists. The rest of the world doesn't want GE
food and won't buy it, yet Canada still listens to an industry that has been
discredited around the world."

Darier said the CBAC report makes vague recommendations about "improving
the regulation of GM foods" and about "the monitoring of long-term health
and environmental impacts of GM foods" but fails to recommend an immediate
moratorium on GM plants and foods UNTIL these improvements are put in

"Is the government waiting for a genetic Chenobyl to happen before acting in
a responsible manner?" asked Darier.

"More than 90 per cent of Canadians want mandatory labelling of GE food,
but the industry is petrified of mandatory labelling because it knows people
don't want GE food," he said. "It's no surprise CBAC doesn't support
mandatory labelling. But CBAC doesn't vote on Bill C-287 this fall - MPs do.
And MPs know that Canadians want mandatory labelling of GE food now."

1) CBAC:
2) Royal Society report : Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for
the Regulations of Food Biotechnology in Canada -

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.