Battle Over GE Soy Heats Up in Brazil

The Guardian (London)
April 17, 2002

Sow resistant: The battle continues to prevent Brazil, a major soya
producer, caving in to pressure to authorise GM crops. Sue Branford reports

BY: Sue Branford

Brazil is coming under increasing pressure to authorise genetically-modified
crops, in the wake of India's decision in late March to open its doors to
this technology. For four years, a small group of underfunded Brazilian
environmentalists and consumers has succeeded against all the odds in
keeping a GM ban in place, but many observers now believe it is only a
matter of time before Brazil, too, follows the worldwide trend.

Brazil is a key piece in the global bio-tech jigsaw. The area under GM
cultivation throughout the world rose from 1.7m hectares in 1996 to 52.6m
hectares in 2001. About two-thirds of this area was planted with a variety
of soya beans genetically engineered by the biotechnology multinational,
Monsanto, to be resistant to the company's herbicide, Round-Up. Both the US,
which is the leading soya producer, and Argentina, which is in third
position, have authorised GM crops. Only Brazil, the second producer, is
still holding out against GM. The Brazilian Chamber of Deputies is expected
shortly to approve a bill that will authorise the cultivation and
consumption of GM products. As a first step, the chamber's special
commission on genetically modified foods approved a highly favourable report
on GM products in late March. If Brazil gives the go-ahead, it will become
increasingly difficult for Europe and Asia to purchase non-GM soya beans at
normal prices. They will become a niche product, for which health conscious
and environmentally aware consumers will have to pay a hefty premium. The GM
crop will be the norm.

Bob Callanan, from the American Soybean Association, which is fervently
pro-GM, said last year: "We are hopeful that the last domino will fall
shortly. That's why the environmentalists are putting up such a stink in
Brazil. They know that, if that goes, it's all gone."

Brazil's stubborn resistance to GM crops took the bio-tech companies by
surprise. Four years ago, Monsanto expected Brazil to authorise GM crops on
the nod, just as had happened in neighbouring Argentina.

As part of its global strategy, Monsanto had bought up seed companies in
Brazil and was poised to dominate bio-tech farming. The Brazilian government
had expressed its support for GM crops and was helping to fund a pounds 250m
factory that Monsanto was building in the north-east of the country to
supply the whole of South America with the raw materials for Round-Up. In
early 2000, Monsanto even imported GM seeds to sell to farmers in the
following planting season, after the anticipated authorisation.

But Greenpeace and the Brazilian Institute for Consumer Defence (IDEC) had
other ideas. They jointly appealed to the courts that the government had no
authority to authorise Monsanto to produce GM seeds when the country's
environmental legislation demanded that studies must first be carried out
into the long-term health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops. In
a historic ruling in May 2000, a Brazilian judge found in favour of the
plaintiffs. Monsanto immediately appealed, but is still waiting for a final
decision, expected shortly.

Until recently, the anti-GM lobby had little support from Brazil's powerful
farming community. Enticed by reports of high GM yields and low production
costs, farmers in the south of Brazil began to purchase GM seeds smuggled
over from Argentina. According to some reports, up to half of the soya
planted in Brazil's most southerly state, Rio Grande do Sul, may be

Over the last year, however, some of Brazil's farmers have been having
second thoughts. A massive soya front has been moving north, taking over
first the plains of Mato Grosso and now moving into the Amazon basin. These
farmers have been very successful with their non-GM exports, with some soya
beans now going directly to Europe through the new port of Itacoatiara on
the Amazon river. Over the last two years, Brazil's share of the world soya
market has risen from 24% to 30%, while the US slice has declined from 57%
to 46%. A farming association recently said that it would be "very foolish"
for Brazil to authorise GM crops, for "we would risk throwing away a market
we have worked very hard to win".

However, Brazil's agriculture minister, Pratini de Moraes, is a firm
advocate of GM crops. On two occasions he tried unsuccessfully to authorise
some GM varieties. On a trip to the US last year, he said that Brazil was
planning to invest heavily in GM crops. "We must not run the risk of being
left behind in the technological race," he added. "We have room for all
kinds of crops in our huge country - GM, conventional and organic. That is
our good fortune."

Over the last few months, the battle over GM has become more heated. In
January, Anthony Harrington, former US ambassador to Brazil and now a
lobbyist for Monsanto, held a private meeting with President Fernando
Henrique Cardoso, now in his eighth and final year in office. Shortly
afterwards, Cardoso called together all ministers involved in the GM debate
and imposed what amounted to a gagging order on environment minister Jose
Sarney Filho, who had openly aligned himself with the environmentalists.
Since then, the minister has resigned, apparently on an unrelated issue.
Attention has now turned to congress. As the chamber of deputies prepares to
vote, several Monsanto directors, including chief executive Rodrigo Almeida,
have been seen lobbying deputies. Ado Pretto, from the opposition Workers'
Party, has spoken of the "enormous pressure" on congress. On three
occasions, environmentalists and members of Brazil's Landless Movement (MST)
have occupied committee rooms, in protest over the government's refusal to
allow a full debate on the issue.

The environmentalists believe that, if they can manage to postpone a final
decision for a few more months, the balance of forces could change. Reports
from Argentina say that GM soya is not living up to expectations; yields
have been disappointing and the use of pesticides has soared, because of the
emergence of disease.

"Time is on our side, for the problems with GM crops are becoming much
clearer," says Flavia Londres, from the anti-GM umbrella group. "Moreover,
this is an election year in Brazil, and unexpected things can happen. No one
knows who will be chosen as the next president of Brazil in October's
elections. The battle is far from lost."

Sue Branford was the BBC correspondent in Brazil. Her book, with Jan Rocha,
on resistance movements in Latin America will be published later this year.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.