Poll Shows US Churchgoers Oppose Gene-Altered Food

Poll Shows US Churchgoers Oppose Gene-Altered Food

The Washington Times
July 29, 2001, Sunday, Final Edition

HEADLINE: Religious worries seen on biotechnology;
Objections varied over 'playing God'
by Larry Witham

Nearly six in 10 American Protestants oppose genetic engineering of
food when it is described as moving genes between different species.
Just more than half of Roman Catholics also worry about this human
intervention in genetics, while Jews in the United States support the
scientific innovation by 55 percent, according to a survey released

The poll, conducted by the University of Virginia's Pew Initiative on Food
and Biotechnology, also found mixed attitudes in the religious population -
while it worried about gene tampering, it equally believed "man has been
empowered by God to use science to improve life."

Biotechnology can be used to give such crops as corn and rice resistance
to insects or disease, or to produce larger fish. It has been called a solution
to hunger by some, but others say it is science "playing God" to make
"Frankenfood" with health risks.

"The debate over this technology has largely centered on the science issues,
but there is clearly an ethical side to it as well that is shaping American
hearts and minds," said Michael Rodemeyer, executive director of the
university's project.

The poll surveyed 1,117 American adults this month and was conducted by
Zogby International. The margin of error was five points for Protestants,
six points for Catholics, seven points for Jews and nine points for Muslims.
The survey found that on the question of people being "empowered by God"
to use science, 62 percent of Jews agreed as did 61 percent of Muslims, 55
percent of Catholics and 54 percent of Protestants.

Respondents identifying themselves as "born again," or evangelical,
Protestants opposed genetic engineering in food by 62 percent. Among all
Protestants, 57 percent were opposed to technology that can "move genes
from one species of organism and put them into another" organism, a process
that may mix plant and animal genes.

Women were more likely than men to oppose biotechnology, whether they
worked inside or outside the home, the survey said.

The survey noted that "playing God" was a common slogan in the biotechnology
debate, so it asked Americans what that phrase meant to them.
The most common interpretation was that "playing God" meant that a few in
science or business would have power to control the technology and decide
who gets the benefits.

Other options, with mixed emphasis given by each religious group, were a
lack of humility, a loss of religious stewardship of creation, and
undermining the purity of organisms.

A final choice was that "playing God" meant scientists had set up a "false
priesthood." This was not a popular interpretation, but was more popular
with Muslims (18 percent) than with Christians (12 percent) or Jews (7

In a statement with the survey, University of Pennsylvania bioethics
professor David Magnus described the opposition to genetically modified
foods as widespread.

But he said it may arise not from a risk-benefit concern, but over the
"playing God" worry, which Britain's Prince Charles used in stirring
Europe's protest against biotechnology.

Public worry about the technology stems from a mixture of this intuitive
"wisdom" and lack of knowledge about the science, Mr. Magnus said.
"Hope remains that public discussion of values in these debates can allow
for the appropriate progress of science and technology." he said.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.