British Medical Association
Attacks GE Crops

"There has not yet been a robust and thorough search into the potentially
harmful effects of GM foodstuffs on human health. On the basis of the
precautionary principle, farm-scale trials should not be allowed to
British Medical Association, November 2002

About 80% of UK practising doctors are members of the BMA.
( ).

Looks like the Prime Minister will have to take on the medical profession
as well as the general public in order to get GM crops through.

For more on the mystery of the missing research on GMOs see:

"Ben Miflin, former director of the Institute of Arable Crops at Rothamsted,
near London, who is a proponent of the potential benefits of genetic
modification of crops.... argues that, under current monitoring conditions,
any unanticipated health impact of such foods would need to be a 'monumental
disaster' to be detectable."
Nature, Volume 398:651, April 22, 1999

Norfolk Genetic Information Network (ngin),
Front page of Scotland's leading national newspaper
Crop trials must stop, say doctors
The Scotsman
Tuesday 19 November, 2002

SENIOR doctors have demanded an immediate halt to genetically modified
crop trials in a move that piles pressure on the Scottish Executive to
reconsider its controversial backing for the programme.

The British Medical Association (BMA) has warned that insufficient care
is being taken to protect public health and that there has been a lack of
public consultation about crop trials despite the steady increase in the
number of them.

The demand that there should be a moratorium on any further planting of
GM crops on a commercial basis is made in a submission to the Scottish
parliament's health committee.

The BMA's warning about the dangers of continuing with trials will be
seen by anti-GM crop campaigners as giving powerful weight to their
argument that the issue must now be reconsidered by Ross Finnie, the
environment minister.

Robin Harper, the Scottish Green Party MSP, said last night: "I am
delighted that the BMA have been prepared to take the same line that we
have been pursuing for some time. It is a very welcome position and one
that must lead to the trials being halted."

The BMA originally set out its case against the further planting of
commercially produced GM crops in 1999, but its latest attack is made
with the benefit of more information. It will be made tomorrow to the
health committee, which is conducting an inquiry into GM crops.

The BMA points out that the number of crop trials has increased steadily,
without public consultation, since their introduction in the early 1990s.
Trials are being held at 178 sites in the UK, 17 are in Scotland.

The BMA was asked by the health committee if it believed the Executive
should prevent GM crop trials from continuing on the grounds that the
policy is against "the precautionary principle to allow them to
continue". The BMA responded: "Yes. As with scientific matters, it can
be difficult and timeconsuming to demonstrate safety to an acceptable
standard. Safety is a relative matter and is generally based on the
results of a robust and thorough search for possible harm.

"There has not yet been a robust and thorough search into the potentially
harmful effects of GM foodstuffs on human health. On the basis of the
precautionary principle, farm-scale trials should not be allowed to

The BMA, which will be represented at the committee hearing by Dr Charles
Saunders, a specialist in public health issues, will point out to the
MSPs that, following public health disasters such as BSE and foot and
mouth disease, public confidence in the scientific communityâ?Ts
approach to agriculture has been undermined.

It adds: "Scientists, farmers and politicians need to re-establish public
trust. Further research is required into the health and environmental
effects of GMOs before they can be permitted to be freely cultivated.

"This may be executed in such a way as not to expose the population to
possibly irreversible environmental risk, which may, in turn, have as yet
unquantified public health implications."

The BMA refers in its document to worries about the issue of antibiotic
resistance. Antibiotic resistance "markers" help identify GM plants and
there is evidence that these genes may be transferred to non-GM plants
and "possibly into pathogenic organisms causing human disease", it warns.

Underlining the responsibility of the parliament and the Executive to
protect the nation's health, the BMA says it is disappointed that, to
date, the Executive has decided not to include health monitoring of local
populations as part of the farm-scale evaluation programme.

In March 2000, four farms, three in Aberdeenshire and one near Munlochy
in the Black Isle, were given the go-ahead to plant GM winter oilseed
rape. Almost immediately a protest group sprung up in the Black Isle and
a 24-hour vigil was established near farmer Jamie Grants land.

Since then 17 sites in Scotland have been involved in the three-year
research programme.

Some protesters have been more direct and the GM crops have been damaged
by activists in Munlochy and Fife. In all 28 people have been charged
since the trials were approved and one man, Donnie MacLeod, an organic
farmer from Ardersier, spent ten days in jail for refusing to identify
others taking part in a protest.

A Scottish Executive spokesman said the crop experiments currently taking
place were final trials under a two-year evaluation scheme. The Executive
had already adopted the "precautionary" approach as Mr Finnie had allowed
the trials go ahead only after scientific evidence suggested there was no
threat to health or the environment.

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.