Organic Consumers Association


Previous Page

Click here to print this page

Make a Donation!


Grist Magazine Covers the Organic Standards Controversy

18 May 2004
Environmental news from GRIST MAGAZINE

USDA Dilutes Meaning of "Organic" Label

If you expect your organic milk to come from antibiotic-free cows, or
your organic produce to be grown with absolutely no toxic pesticides,
or your shampoo that's labeled organic to have actually met some
organic standards, then you might be miffed by new Bush
administration tweaks to organic policy. Activists say changes made
last month, with no public input, could water down organic standards
and make the federal organic program more to the liking of
agribusiness. Read all about it in Muckraker -- today on the Grist
Magazine website.

Organic: Friend or Faux?

Organics Program Weakened Under Bush Administration Changes, Activists Say
by Amanda Griscom

18 May 2004

The Bush administration is giving Americans new reason to watch what they
eat -- and it's got nothing to do with carbs.

Over the course of 10 days in mid-April, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
issued three "guidances" and one directive -- all legally binding
interpretations of law -- that threaten to seriously dilute the meaning of
the word organic and discredit the department's National Organic Program.

And the changes -- which would allow the use of antibiotics on organic dairy
cows, synthetic pesticides on organic farms, and more -- were made with zero
input from the public or the National Organic Standards Board, the advisory
group that worked for more than a decade to help craft the first federal
organic standards, put in place in October 2002.

The USDA insists that the changes are innocuous: "The directives have not
changed anything. They are just clarifications of what is in the regulations
that were written by the National Organic Standards Board," USDA
spokesperson Joan Shaffer told Muckraker. "They just explain what's
enforceable. There is no difference [between the clarifications and the
original regulations] -- it's just another way of explaining it."

But Jim Riddle, vice chair of the NOSB and endowed chair in agricultural
systems at the University of Minnesota, argues that what the USDA is trying
to pass off as a clarification of regulations is actually a substantial
change: "These are the sorts of changes for which the department is supposed
to do a formal new rulemaking process, with posting in the federal register,
feedback from our advisory board, and a public-comment period. And yet there
is no such process denoted anywhere."

Organic activists suspect that industry pressure drove the policy shifts.
They point out that the USDA leadership has long-standing industry
sympathies: Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman served on the board of
directors of a biotech company, and both her chief of staff and her director
of communications were plucked right out of National Cattlemen's Beef

"Even though it evolved as a reaction against large-scale American
agribusinesses, the organic food industry has seen tremendous growth,
roughly 20 to 24 percent a year for the past 10 years," said Ronnie Cummins,
founder and national director of the Organic Consumers Association. "That,
not surprisingly, has brought with it investments from big business and
demands for conventional farming practices more favorable to mass

One practice favored by large agribusiness is the use of antibiotics on
cows, and a guidance [PDF] issued on April 14 will allow just that on
organic dairy farms, a dramatic reversal of 2002 rules. Under the new
guidelines, sickly dairy cows can be treated not just with antibiotics but
with numerous others drugs and still have their milk qualify as organic, so
long as 12 months pass between the time the treatments are administered and
the time the milk is sold.

"This new directive makes a mockery of organic standards," said Richard
Wood, a recent member of the FDA's Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee
and executive director of Food Animal Concerns Trust. "Organic farmers that
we have talked to are furious because they have been very careful to follow
the antibiotics rule. [The rule change] undercuts their ability to make a
living doing things right."

Furthermore, said Wood, the use of antibiotics will reduce the pressure on
organic farmers to provide healthy accommodations for their livestock. If
they know they can pump their animals up with drugs, they won't have to
worry so much about disease spreading when cows are penned up in close
quarters, or about weaning calves from their mothers at an unnaturally early

"It's hard to deny that this looks awfully like a political move by USDA to
do the bidding of larger dairy operations that want to produce organic milk
by expanding their herds with cattle that were once on non-organic farms,"
Wood said.

Another new guidance [PDF] put out on the same day would allow cattle
farmers to feed their heifers non-organic fishmeal that could be riddled
with synthetic preservatives, mercury, and PCBs and still sell their beef as

And the following week, on April 23, the USDA took the particularly
egregious step of issuing a legal directive [PDF] that opens the door for
use of some synthetic pesticides on organic farms.

Previously, organic farmers were only allowed to use natural, non-toxic
pesticides on their crops, which effectively prohibited use of pesticides
with hidden ingredients (pesticide manufacturers often don't list certain
ingredients, claiming the information is proprietary).

According to the new guidelines, however, organic farmers and certifiers are
only required to make a "reasonable effort" to find out what is in the
pesticides being applied to crops. "If they can't come up with the info on
toxic inert ingredients that may be in their pesticides, they're off the
hook" said Liana Hoodes, organic policy coordinator for the National
Campaign for Sustainable Agriculture. "This takes all the pressure off of
pesticide manufacturers to reveal their ingredients and develop non-toxic
products. In fact, it creates a disincentive."

Last but certainly not least, another guidance [PDF] released on April 14
narrows the scope of the federal organic certification program to crops and
livestock and the products derived from them, meaning that national organic
standards will not be developed for fish, nutritional supplements, pet food,
fertilizers, cosmetics, and personal-care products.

"Consumers beware: This basically allows any opportunistic company to put
fraudulent 'organic' labels on products outside of the regulated domain,
without any liability concerns," Hoodes told Muckraker.

There have never been federal organic standards for these product categories
-- which is why you cannot now trust an "organic" label on a bottle of
shampoo or a package of farm-raised salmon -- but the USDA had previously
said it would develop such standards. In anticipation of that eventuality,
many companies have invested millions of dollars over the past decade to
develop fish farms and factories for non-agricultural products that adhere
to criteria consistent with those for organic crops and livestock.

"All that effort has just flown out the window," Cummins told Muckraker.
"It's an outrage for the 30 million consumers who pay a premium for organic
products and expect that they can trust the organic claim."

The USDA rejects activists' interpretation of this particular guidance:
"There's a process to go through [to develop organic guidelines for
non-agricultural categories] and it hasn't happened [yet]," said Shaffer.
"It could still happen. I'm not clairvoyant."

Despite the USDA's demurrals, activists view the department's changes as a
serious threat to hard-won standards for organic products. The National
Campaign for Sustainable Agriculture and other groups are investigating
possible industry influence into the USDA's process, and some environmental
groups are preparing to take legal action.

"Secretary Veneman should withdraw these new directives and follow the
appropriate rulemaking procedures," said Riddle of the NOSB. "We want them
withdrawn and to do it right."

- - - - - - - - -