Washington Post Covers
Mexican Corn Crisis

The Washington Post
March 25, 2002

The Biotech Corn Debate Grows Hot in Mexico
BY: Marc Kaufman

The origins of modern corn can be traced to the remote valleys of Central
America, where it was first cultivated 10,000 years ago from the wild
teosinte plant. What is grown today in the vast cornfields of Iowa and on
small local farms may have only limited genetic resemblance to those
agricultural ancestors, but southern Mexico in particular remains the center
of corn genetic diversity around the world.

That's why the international scientific battle now raging over the reported
presence of genetic material from genetically engineered plants in Mexican
corn is so bitter and emotional. The Mexican government banned the planting
of modified corn in 1998 precisely because it didn't want its native stock
to be mixed with the sometimes controversial creations of crop
biotechnology. But new -- and hotly contested -- research suggests that the
commingling has happened anyway. The Mexican corn drama began last fall,
after two researchers from the University of California at Berkeley prepared
to report that they had found telltale sequences of genetically altered corn
in the genome of corn from the hills of southern Mexico. The results were
first published in a letter in the journal Nature, and then in a full
article. They were decried by the Mexican government but widely disseminated
by groups generally opposed to genetically engineered crops.

The two researchers wrote that they had conclusively found traces of the
cauliflower mosaic virus -- widely used as a "promoter" to drive the
activity of newly inserted genes -- as well as other samples of genetically
modified DNA in ears of corn from two locations around Oaxaca.

"I had believed for some time that it was possible for transgenic DNA moving
out into Mexican farmers' fields, and nobody seemed interested in monitoring
that," said Ignacio Chapela, who conducted the study with David Quist. "We
did the monitoring, we found the transgenes that were not supposed to be
there, and then we got viciously attacked by people who didn't like our

There indeed was an immediate response from scientists, especially those who
support crop biotechnology, who attacked the researchers' conclusions and
methodology. In particular, critics said the researchers relied on a testing
method that is known to produce false positives for the presence of
genetically modified DNA -- the commonly used polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) method -- and that their research was not broad enough to support the
conclusions they drew.

"Their work was mysticism masquerading as science," said Matthew Metz, a
post-doctoral fellow in microbiology at the University of Washington. Metz,
who was a graduate student in Chapela's department at Berkeley, is one of
four who have submitted critical letters to Nature.

"There are a lot of political issues in the background here, but the primary
concern for many of us is that science is being abused, that the scientific
process is being taken advantage of for ideological reasons," Metz said.
The dispute quickly escalated, with charges made by both sides that central
players had damaging conflicts of interest, and that scientists were
essentially acting from political and commercial motives. Chapela said he
was personally intimidated and threatened by fellow scientists and Mexican
officials; critics said that at Berkeley, he had a track record of
opposition to biotechnology that made his science highly suspect.

The charges and countercharges are difficult to disentangle, but the stakes
are plainly high. As producers of genetically modified crops seek to sell
their products around the world, opponents of the technology (who worry it
could have as-yet undetected environmental and health consequences) are
eager to find examples of biotechnology that have caused regulatory and
financial disruptions.

The most prominent case involved StarLink corn, which had been approved in
the United States only for use in animal feed but was found in hundreds of
corn products from tacos to grits. But there are a growing list of others:
Thousands of acres of genetically modified cotton have been found in India,
although it was never approved for use there. A class action suit was filed
recently by organic farmers in Canada, who said their canola crop was being
tainted with genetically modified canola blowing in from neighboring fields.
And now there is the possibility that the cradle of corn has been forever
Some initial tests by the deeply worried Mexican government seemed to
confirm the conclusions of the Nature article, but subsequent testing has
raised new questions about the PCR process.

Timothy Reeves, executive director of the International Maize and Wheat
Improvement Center in Mexico, an international nonprofit group that has
collected a germ bank of corn species, said that none of its extensive
testing has found genetic material from modified plants in Mexican corn.
He also said that a recent set of tests by the Mexican government
demonstrated how unreliable PCR testing can be. The government, he said,
performed PCR testing on kernels of corn from the center's germ bank and
found that many were tainted. But some of those kernels had been in storage
for 20 or 30 years, Reeves said, and so could not have been affected by
recently engineered varieties.

Nonetheless, Reeves also said the Nature article turned what his
organization always knew was a theoretical threat into a real and pressing
problem. He said it is quite possible that corn with some products of
genetic engineering is growing now in Mexico, or will soon be growing there,
despite its ban. That is just how corn, and people, behave.
"The corn that people think of as native Mexican varieties have actually
been evolving over centuries, and still are changing all the time," Reeves
said. "It's a dynamic process, and new genetic material is being introduced
through cross-pollination in every new crop."

The winds, however, may not have been responsible for the reported
transgenic material in Oaxaca corn. Since the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) was signed, millions of tons of American and Canadian corn
have flooded the Mexican market, and between 30 percent and 40 percent of
that corn is grown from genetically engineered kernels. Although those seeds
may not be planted under Mexican law, researchers theorize that farmers may
well have planted them anyway -- either to try their possible benefits or
through ignorance.

The inevitability of the spread of engineered genes into some conventional
Mexican corn raises what Reeves said is the key question in the debate that
is just now beginning: Does it matter? Advocates of biotechnology say that
it does not, that natural selection will ensure that only useful traits are
kept and that others will simply disappear. Critics say the possibility of
harm from those genes is too great to risk their indiscriminate and
unplanned spread.

"We don't want to fall into the trap of saying [the possible presence of
modified DNA in Mexican corn] is a disaster without real evidence," said
Reeves. "But we also don't want to fall into the trap of saying it's no
problem, either. This is a serious issue that has to be addressed with
rigorous science."

Home | News | Organics | GE Food | Health | Environment | Food Safety | Fair Trade | Peace | Farm Issues | Politics
Español | Campaigns | Buying Guide | Press | Search | Donate | About Us | Contact Us

Organic Consumers Association - 6771 South Silver Hill Drive, Finland MN 55603
E-mail: Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.